Instigator / Pro
0
1702
rating
574
debates
67.86%
won
Topic
#2992

Flat Earth is physically viable/plausible, if space agencies are lying (especially NASA and Roscosmos)

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
4

After 4 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

Benjamin
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1774
rating
97
debates
77.32%
won
Description

Plausible and viable mean that nothing about it is impossible or self-contradictory. It doesn't mean that it has to match things like gravity or the standard world map's southern hemisphere's proportions (especially of Antarctica).

-->
@Theweakeredge

The debate that Benjamin asked to engage in was that he firmly believes the flat earth theory itself is contradictory and implausible. I have not deceived or dodged anything, he and many round earthers believe that. I am handling that specifically in this debate.

You are angry about nothing, I didn't even do anything to you yet you have been nonstop hostile to me the past few days.

-->
@RationalMadman

Sure.

Here you arguing that the flat earth is PLAUSIBLE - not that it exists - but that its a POSSIBILITY. Then, you added on a stringet "Especially if NASA cant be trusted" yet you didnt at all word it to include that within your BoP. It seems to me like you can't actually PROVE that the earth is flat or that NASA can't be trusted

-->
@Theweakeredge

I don't understand what you are even saying.

-->
@RationalMadman

Is plausible? And you want to get uppity about biased debates? Are you seriously that unselfaware?

-->
@Benjamin

how many do you want, it will become extremely in-depth as we clash on many points and explain things.

-->
@RationalMadman

30 000 characters

are you kidding me

-->
@Benjamin

your debate's wording and structure seems very strange to me, I will prefer this topic and dynamic. I have left it as an open challenge.