Instigator / Pro
56
1557
rating
35
debates
52.86%
won
Topic
#3094

Sex work should not be legally prohibited for adults

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
24
9
Better sources
16
6
Better legibility
8
5
Better conduct
8
1

After 8 votes and with 35 points ahead, the winner is...

Nevets
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
21
1502
rating
8
debates
37.5%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro presented the only arguments, and as such these are more convincing. I am not giving sources because in order to consider sources as a voting issue one side needs to either present very bad, or outstanding sources. Pro's sources are fairly average, and Con doesn't give any sources, so there was no serious violation on Cons part. I am not going to give spelling to anyone because Pro's spelling was not egregious, and I can't punish Con for any spelling errors either as there were no speeches made by Con. I am not going to give conduct to either side because they both FFed over half of their speeches, and although I wish double loss was a thing, it is not, so I have to leave this blank. Yes the argument could be made that 1 speech is better than none, but at the end of the day I do not think that there is a substantial difference between skipping 3 or 4 rounds.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Arguments to Pro for full forfeit. Conduct to Pro for full forfeit. Sources has been given to Pro on top of that because he did provide sources for his argument. Spelling and Grammar is tied because one can’t judge on that without seeing what Con would’ve posted.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both sides forfeited, but only one made an argument.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeiture on both sides [fully for Con], since, although Pro offered a round 1 argument, which is compelling, by the way, with the sourced stats reduction evident by several studies cited by Pro, Pro forfeited all following rounds, which scores a forfeiture. All Pro needed to do was enter an extension in all following rounds to score a win. However, by having a first round arguments, Pro wins the source and conduct points, thus backing into a win, overall.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

FF .

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Greater forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both FFs and both abandoned their debate, but at least Pro did something.