Instigator / Pro
4
1469
rating
10
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#3225
Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use. (whiteflame requested and accepted)
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...
RationalMadman
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
28
1794
rating
498
debates
69.28%
won
Description
Opponent must present a topic and framework in the chat. I will agree with a specific resolution and debate that topic.
ONLY RULE IS NO TROLLISH TOPICS.
Any suggested changes to the debate will be implemented.
(This debate is a copy, because I want to debate an active person.)
Round 1
Forfeited
no restrictions means that more bacteria can be killed.
Round 2
Forfeited
restrictions aren't needed, let the doctors restrict themselves. trust
Round 3
Forfeited
Look at me, look at meJust called to say that it's good to beAlive, in such a small worldI'm all curled up with a book to readI can make money, open up a thrift storeI can make a living off a magazineI can design an engine sixty-four miles to a gallon of gasolineI can make new antibioticsI can make computers survive aquatic conditionsI know how to run a businessAnd I can make you wanna buy a productMovers, shakers, and producersMe and my friends understand the futureI see the strings that control the systemsI can do anything with no resistance 'cause—
This debate won't matter anyway. The mods won't let me on the site until I'm 13. Ragnar DM'ed me
The accepted part
What part of whiteflame requested and accepted did you not understand?!
Agreed.
It'll have to wait a bit, likely won't be able to start this until the weekend, so I'll accept a little before then.
In the meantime, I would like to clarify what definitions we are using.
My use of the words "Establishing restrictions" implies the government actively imposing limitations on antibiotic usage. Are we agreed on that?
I'm willing to accept Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use as PRO. Accept it when ready.
I'd be up for variations on any of the following:
Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use (either side)
Environmental movements should support climate engineering that fundamentally alters the environment in an attempt to combat global warming (Con)
Government agencies that regulate drugs should only test whether a drug is safe, not whether it is effective, before approving it for public use (Con)
I'm interested in what you think of my plan to get the US out of debt:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13C09M6rSyjeQKNWXh_hG-9MreNwat2vEZVfO4E1zZKY/edit#gid=592285639
Eh, been done a lot.
THBT: the benefits of gun control outweigh the harms
(im not interested in debating just thought id throw out some suggestions)