Instigator / Pro
4
1469
rating
10
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#3225

Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use. (whiteflame requested and accepted)

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
2
8
Better legibility
1
4
Better conduct
1
4

After 4 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
28
1700
rating
544
debates
68.01%
won
Description

Opponent must present a topic and framework in the chat. I will agree with a specific resolution and debate that topic.

ONLY RULE IS NO TROLLISH TOPICS.

Any suggested changes to the debate will be implemented.

(This debate is a copy, because I want to debate an active person.)

Round 1
Pro
#1
Forfeited
Con
#2
no restrictions means that more bacteria can be killed.

Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
restrictions aren't needed, let the doctors restrict themselves. trust
Round 3
Pro
#5
Forfeited
Con
#6
Look at me, look at me
Just called to say that it's good to be
Alive, in such a small world
I'm all curled up with a book to read
I can make money, open up a thrift store
I can make a living off a magazine
I can design an engine sixty-four miles to a gallon of gasoline
I can make new antibiotics
I can make computers survive aquatic conditions
I know how to run a business
And I can make you wanna buy a product
Movers, shakers, and producers
Me and my friends understand the future
I see the strings that control the systems
I can do anything with no resistance 'cause—