Instigator / Pro
15
1501
rating
2
debates
50.0%
won
Topic

DebateArt would be better in video form rather than in text form

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
15
Sources points
8
10
Spelling and grammar points
4
5
Conduct points
0
5

With 5 votes and 20 points ahead, the winner is ...

Incel-chud
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Miscellaneous
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
35
1456
rating
6
debates
16.67%
won
Description
~ 123 / 5,000

video definition as defined by Webster
video length can be short format like 3-4 minutes and concluding round say 2 minutes

Round 1
Pro
My case is simple
First I'll prove why video is better than text
Then - How DART can go big through video format 

video is better than text
1. More Immersive Experience
2. Videos Are Less Likely to Get Skipped or Ignored
3. Gets Higher Click Rates Over a Text
4. Better at Communicating Tone and Personality

DART can go big in through video format
debate in text format doesn't appeal to people especially the younger generation
DART can create YouTube shorts, Insta reels, TikTok videos to have more reach
video based tournaments have different appeal than text
Con
I did the debate in video format. I see no reason for pro to object to this, unless they are being a hypocrite. https://youtu.be/RmJIPkzsh8U
Round 2
Pro
Forfeited
Con
Vote for me please, because I made an attempt to stick to a video format, that pro prefers while they neglected to, and I showed that video format can be used within the text debates we have here.

Also vote for me because of my argument about how those of us who have anxiety disorders might be excluded from debate in a place that requires video format.