THBT: SOCIETY would be BETTER OFF if LGBTQ people did not EXIST

1. Psychopathically slaughtering all openly LGTBQ people today (flawed because it fails to target those in the closet, plus... you know... Morals).
   
2. Going back in time and rerunning a simulated equivalent to our Earth where all the LGBTQ people didn't exist.
   
3. Magically turning absolutely all LGBTQ people completely heteronormative in gender identity and heterosexual in sexual identity (100% impossible, which I will get to).
   

There are 69 countries that have laws that criminalise homosexuality

Depending on where they’re headed, gay travelers can face great risks. In April 2019, the country of Brunei enacted an Islamic law making it legal to flog and stone LGBTQ people to death. And it’s not the only country to have the death penalty on the books: A few others include Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran. According to Equaldex, a range of gay activities are illegal in 71 countries.

“We have seen LGBTQ+ people dear to our hearts be discriminated against and our deepest desire for writing this article was to bring awareness to these issues and hopefully catalyze change,” says Fergusson. “As travel journalists, we wanted to help the LGBTQ+ community educate themselves on the very complex and layered world of staying safe during international travel.”

The journalists looked at the top 150 most-visited countries in the world by the number of incoming tourists, then ranked them using eight factors, including laws against gay relationships, legal protection against discrimination and more. According to the report, a few factors—such as adoption recognition and worker protections—may not affect travelers directly but are a good indication of overall attitudes within the culture.

“These issues can affect everything, from your ability to show public displays of affection to being able to share a hotel room bed to the capacity at which you can use dating apps without being caught by the local police,” reads the report.

Topping the LGBTQ+ Danger Index is Nigeria, which is considered the worst country for violence against gay travelers. There, people can be put in prison for up to 14 years just for being gay, and some states even have the death penalty under Sharia law. 

Sweden is the safest country in the world for LGBTQ travelers. Same-sex marriage has been legal there since 2009, and the country has more Pride festivals per capita than anywhere else in the world.

One shocking statistic: “A whopping 47 of the 70 countries that have illegal same-sex relationships were part of the British Empire. That is 67%!” says Fergusson. “This isn’t a coincidence. In almost all cases, the laws outlawing consensual gay sex were put into place under British rule and were left in place following independence.”

The vast majority of the world’s sexual minority population — an estimated 83 percent of those who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual — keep their orientation hidden from all or most of the people in their lives, according to a new study by the Yale School of Public Health that could have major implications for global public health.

It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome.
— Ben Neale, geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute

And even this new study has a big limitation, one that has been inherent to major genomic studies for the last two decades: GWAS studies are too white.

“There’s many politically correct ways of saying this, but basically the study is mostly a Caucasian sample of European ancestry. So, it does not include peoples from Latin America, Asia and Africa,” said Dr. Eric Vilain, director of the Center for Genetic Medicine Research at Children’s National Health System. “The second limitation is that the way they lumped together what they call ‘nonheterosexuals’”

The researchers had members of the same-sex community review the study’s design and language, and they admit that their terminology and definitions for gay, lesbian and heterosexual do not reflect the full nature of the sexuality continuum.

They did attempt to examine some elements of this continuum by conducting GWAS analysis on three smaller DNA databases wherein the participants had been surveyed using the Kinsey Scale. The Kinsey Scale is a somewhat infamous test for determining the strength of a person’s feelings toward members of the same- and opposite-sexes. In other words, it tries to judge if a person leans gay, straight or bisexual.

The team found genetics cannot explain people’s scores on the Kinsey Scale.

“We discovered that the Kinsey Scale … is really an oversimplification of the diversity of sexual behavior in humans,” Neale said. Bailey disagrees, arguing that people’s feelings of sexual interest and arousal — and therefore, their readouts on the Kinsey Scale — may be too complicated to validate through genetics.

He did agree with Neale that the debate is now closed on whether any single gene is responsible for sexual orientation.

“[Our study] underscores an important role for the environment in shaping human sexual behavior and perhaps most importantly there is no single gay gene but rather the contribution of many small genetic effects scattered across the genome,” Neale said.

• Even if it's just by a little, society would be better off without LGBTQ people in almost every rationalization one can male. 
  
• What is being proposed here is a hypothetical concurrent world where lesbian, gay, bisexual, and people do not exist, and I think no matter how we view it, that world will always be somewhat better without LGBTQ people. 
  

We don't even know how many butterfly effect campaigns and minority-defences (such as of the disabled) have ended up much more successful thanks to the sensitivity towards LGBTQ people that came with their campaigning for equal rights and the successes involved.

On top of that, this rerun simulation could remove plenty of people from history, even Jesus himself or George Washington if they were closeted slightly bi-leaning individuals. We can literally not know how much and how severe this rerun would be.

• Even if it's just by a little, society would be better off without LGBTQ people in almost every rationalization one can male. 
  
• What is being proposed here is a hypothetical concurrent world where lesbian, gay, bisexual, and people do not exist, and I think no matter how we view it, that world will always be somewhat better without LGBTQ people. 
  

Pro says that even if the reduction is by 'a little' the society is better off but that doesn't explain which part of the LGBTQ have been eliminated nor is that within the scope of the resolution which blatantly is regarding the entire annihilation leading to the elimination of all LGBTQ people.