No such thing as being in business for yourself and being your own boss.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
This thing about being your own boss, Sounds nice but is completely phony.
Being in business for yourself, You are not.
Do you know who you are in business for?
The customers own your business.
They dictate the business and ultimately have all power to shut it down.
All under their control.
So if you want to go into business for yourself, Don't get excited to be a CEO.
You can be a CEO, PRESIDENT OR OWNER going into bankruptcy.
Anyone thinks the contrary, Welcome.
Any questions about the topic or requests, Please comment or send a message.
https://youtu.be/NisCkxU544c
Too weak of an affirmative case to reach BoP. Some interesting questions about interconnected roles, does not dismiss authority of various boss roles as con was easily able to show; further con was able to wholly falsify the framework that with examples of religious workers and homeless people who answer to no one.
We agree, we have the same position. Not sure what the hang up is .
you're not the boss of the consumer... You're the boss of your employees... xD
"Being a boss in a business requires you to respect the fact that if nobody demands what you supply at the quality, in the way and/or at the price you provide it... you will go bankrupt."
We agree, we have the same position. Don't tell me I'm the boss of a consumer with the power to bankrupt my store. Quit the wavering.
If you think the other side won, then vote for the other side. If you merely think a vote is short on analysis, then show better analysis in your own votes to lead the charge on quality improvement.
As things currently stand, you’re just complaining about the existence of votes.
Too late
If I were making this debate, I would have included a rule that Barney may not vote
I'll try to get to this.
Easy vote if you care to (in my opinion) cheers.