Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#3626
Men are able to hit women if the women hit him back
Status
Voting
Participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
The voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
More details
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Category
- People
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Rated
- Characters per argument
- 10,000
Contender / Con
7
1662
rating
15
debates
90.0%
won
Description
~ 0
/
5,000
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
x. Default to con
- As a typical baseline for the progression of any debate, I note that pro bears the burden of proof, and with the absence of any argument from the contender, the resolution automatically favors his position in respect to the absence of an upheld burden from the instigator.
Round 2
Forfeited
x. Default to con
- Extend, the rational course of action is evident. My opponent has forfeited all rounds and I as con need not present an argument of my own as pro bears the burden of proof.
bruh i forgot that this debate existed. i was too busy doing the same thing to little kids on youtube. sorry for forfeiting lmao
What if one of them uses knuckledusters? What if one of them uses dicks? No clarification, no clarification. Clouded, Hmm?
"men are able to hit women if women hit him back"
LMFAO, this makes it sound like if a man first attacks a woman, yet she retaliates he's now allowed to continue the beating.
Outside of that, i see no problem with men fighting women in self defence, if a woman hits a man she ought to be ready to throw hands. I'm perfectly fine with fighting women if i have too, i lose no sleep over the thought.