Biological reincarnation is real.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 22,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
It's evident, it's true that the topic is correct. It's scientific as in realizing everything around us.
Even philosophically broached by Swami Satchidananda . Everything that is will be.
That's as far as I'll go in the description. If you're really sharp, you'll see the topic is fact and non-contestable .
"Please don't cherry pick language in desperate attempt to make an argument." This was said by Pro after Con pointed out that the process described by Pro fails to meet the definition of reincarnation (which is an integral part of the debate title and claim). This is not cherry picking, but pointing out that Pro's arguments fail to even broach the correct topic.
As a note, this is why I like to put definitions in my description so that this kind of Kritik can't happen.
In the end, Pro concedes the debate.
"'Changing form is not reincarnation.' "
Never said it was. Pay sharp attention to the exact order of words.
My position has nothing to do with reincarnation itself."
Literally states that he has no arguments on the grounds of reincarnation.
Nah it's real most definitely people. You're living proofs of it .
I thought you had to complete debates to vote?
Just remove her voting permissions.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Shila // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Con
>Reason for Decision:
Pro was denying his position more than he was rebutting Con.
Over a billion Hindus believe in reincarnation.
2 billion Christian’s believe in resurrection. Which is simply the reincarnation of the soul.
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter has to assess specific arguments presented by both sides in the debate. Generalizing about what one of the debaters did or didn't do in this debate is not sufficient, nor is detailing some background on perceptions of reincarnation.
**************************************************
I think this will be related to decomposition and eating things.