Instigator / Con
0
1432
rating
361
debates
42.11%
won
Topic
#3754

You pick the topic.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
20,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
1
1890
rating
98
debates
93.37%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Here's a chance for you to design the platform based on your topic selection.
We'll obviously have opposing sides.

Whatever topic you choose of course, it'll fit whichever side it falls on for you in tandem with the position preset .

***THE TOPICS CANNOT BE DUPLICATE. IT'S AN AUTOMATIC FORFEITING IF THR SAME TOPIC IS CHOSEN***

Questions and concerns, leave a comment or send a message.

Round 1
Con
#1
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Here's a chance for you to design the platform based on your topic selection.
We'll obviously have opposing sides.
Whatever topic you choose of course, it'll fit whichever side it falls on for you in tandem with the position preset .
***THE TOPICS CANNOT BE DUPLICATE. IT'S AN AUTOMATIC FORFEITING IF THE SAME TOPIC IS CHOSEN***
Questions and concerns, leave a comment or send a message.

Pro
#2
  • The topic is "THBT racial segregation in public schools should be illegal." 

Round 2
Con
#3
I'm going to reapply this as it's a universal formula and setup for the foundation of constituting "should". That is what should be and should not be based on just natural law, let alone man made law and personal opinion.

Following that which is the cause or purpose connects the two.

Presenting this example again and for those concerned about SOURCES, pay attention. My inhaling these fatal toxic fumes , I should be dead. The effect following the cause logical follows and necessitates.

The United States once more has a government called the United States government or affectionately "Uncle Sam".

This government has democracy to vote in elected officials to orchestrate the legality process. This government has democracy which in turn via those elected parties or directly through petition, vote in on laws.

There's a whole legislature, congress to pass or veto laws.

Whatever laws that are passed by the United States government should in fact be legal.

That's just simply what it would mean.

Something shouldn't be illegal and that thing is legally passed. It doesn't compute. These are opposite.

The laws put in effect via congressional, legislative, political arenas, that process ,the cause should be legally in effect as that what it means to put them in effect.

A vote, a pass on a law should be a legalized law because it would of meant the government has passed it.

Any law passed, Jim Crow, segregation, purge, sundown towns, whatever, should be legal because something happened called the "passing of that law".



Pro
#4
  • We are not debating whether or not a law should be illegal, we are debating whether or not passing laws segregation should be illegal. Regardless segregation should in fact be illegal because they violate the civil rights act. In addition, people are endowed with the rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness which segregation in public schools would violate. I don't see any argument from Mall against the resolution. 
  • You can legally pass something that should be illegal, but we are debating whether or not this should be legal, not whether making laws should be legal. Mall has thus not made a case for his position.