rapist we all are
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Arguments:
Con did a two fold case. First BoP, and second that implicitly that innocent people are not magically the worst of the worst depraved criminals (at least not without some reason to suggest so).
Counter to this, the entire pro case is: "rape cause ?"
Sources:
Source spam without analysis is not something I reward. This feels like just an advertisement for a bad YouTube channel.
Legibility:
The absence of legibility, is in it of itself failure in legibility. Literally posting only two words in one round, and none in the other, harms this. Even a nicely formatted "Forfeited" is far superior to this.
Conduct:
Con missed one round. In a two round debate this could cost him the debate, but I choose to evaluate the arguments and grade them for their merits.
curious who you think won this, not that I don't expect to get voted into a loss regardless because I got busy.
Only a Sith speaks in absolutes!
Yoda he may be, and Yoda he may be not. Like a Sith, you are absolutely doing. Not so sure you are, hmm?
Did Yoda make this?
Not even a need to look at the links. Without some analysis in the debates itself, they’re wholly disconnected from the arguments.