Instigator / Pro
35
1500
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Topic
#3878

The Europeans were justified in conquering the Americas in the name of progress

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
15
9
Better sources
10
8
Better legibility
5
4
Better conduct
5
0

After 5 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...

FrEeMaSoN1692
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
21
1709
rating
565
debates
68.23%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

full forfeit

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro makes assumptions that the technical advances that are correlated to European conquest, actually is a good thing, yet never defends that. Con, while the majority cut and paste, does show clear conduct examples that show the conquest was not justifiable retrospectively. Con forfeits too many rounds.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Conduct points are lost for forfeitures. Arguments are left tied because there are too many forfeitures, and thus Con didn't refute points that Pro failed to truly prove.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

"by the choice of one side to miss at least 40% of the debate, the requirement [to consider arguments] ceases."

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Conduct for forfeitures.

Arguments I am leaving tied. Pros case fails to prove it was justified at the time, but with con missing too much it was not his arguments which carried it.