Instigator / Pro
0
1495
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#3922
Male superiority in chess does not occur as a result of biological differences
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
RationalMadman
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
3
1709
rating
565
debates
68.23%
won
Description
Men don't perform better than women in chess, at niether the highest level nor club level.
To win con must prove that it is likely biological advantages men have over women result disparity between the two sexes in chess playing ability.
Rules:
No new arguments in the final round
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Concession and forfeiture.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
full forfeit from con
note: I would recommend taking this down for it could tarnish your reputation RileyByng
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro conceded and forfeited.
It is indeed biological advantages that made men the rulers instead of women dominantly over the past three millenia, that made the first chess clubs exclusive to gentlemen and not ladies, which eventually lead to more men grandmasters at play than women due to traditions affected by even older traditions, affected by bodily advantages that once actually did matter.
Guess what made more males participate in chess in the first place?