1287
rating
346
debates
39.88%
won
Topic
#4055
Everyone should be a vegetarian or vegan
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 13 points ahead, the winner is...
AustinL0926
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1636
rating
33
debates
93.94%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
I dont remember debating you before.
Alright, go ahead and tell us why you chose a side that justifies the killing of animals for your pleasure.
I. Constructives
"Everyone" means "every person." [1]
As such, BoP is on PRO to argue that every single person currently alive should be a vegan/vegetarian.
This includes people with serious health issues that preclude them from being a vegan/vegetarian, including:
- Irritable bowel syndrome
- Soy/nut/bean/egg allergies
- Celiac disease
- Chron's disease
- Kidney failure
- Protein deficiency
- Iron/zinc deficiency
As well as babies, the elderly, the pregnant, and the sick.
PRO must prove that every single person with any (or multiple) of these conditions should be vegetarian or vegan.
Short round, back to PRO.
II. Sources
Round 2
We should kill animals. We should torture animals for our pleasure. We should imprison animals so that you may live. We should make animals slaves. Animals deserve to suffer and be turned into food. Animals are weak. Eating animals will make us rich. Eating animals will make us poop gold. Eating animals will make us live longer. Eating animals will make us live forever. Eating animals should be mandatory. Eating animals will prevent world war 2. Eating animals will make us smart like chicken. Eating animals is great. Eating animals is awesome. Eating animals is art.
Not correct, Con. Try again.
Extend.
Round 3
You are so great Pro. You made an excellent argument.
Not.
BoP remains on PRO to prove that everyone should be a vegetarian or vegan. Extend.
Round 4
Ok, you seem to have very low IQ since you didnt figure out how this works. You have to be interesting in order to debate me.
I wont debate a retarded autist who just repeats "Extend, extend, extend".
Btw, out of all autistic people here, you decide to copy Novice? Well, your choice. And what a poor choice that is.
My choice is to block you so you can no longer accept my debates. Get it, retard? In case you later wonder why you were blocked.
EXTEND.
BoP remains on PRO to prove that everyone should be a vegetarian or vegan. Extend.
Round 5
Extend, captain autism.
First of all, as someone who has an autistic friend IRL, I don't really appreciate you using "autistic" as an insult. Voters should deduct conduct points for this.
Second of all, you haven't contested my R1 arguments in any way, meaning you've failed to fulfill your burden of proof.
Vote CON.
Well, I suppose there is certainly some elegance in your "nothing exists outside of the text" approach.
Don't. If someone is employing sarcasm in a text-based debating site where everything and only anything in text form matters, treat it literally. In that case, it is entirely justified of you to treat it as a concession, which is what you did.
Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not
In R2, this is one of the most savage extendations I have ever seen.
"I have an autistic friend"
Yeah, I am crying for you right now.
bvump vot fors
I have positive thoughts about veganism. I don’t believe it should be mandated, but I would like for a law to exist where all companies that make meat are required to go from 100% meat to 99.5% meat, .5% plant protein. And then increase the plant percentage by .5% per year so in 200 years, we aren’t killing animals for food anymore. I’ve asked 3 people their thought on this idea, and they all like it, so I think it can take off.