You can prove God the Father is a person.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Pretty straightforward to prove from the biblical scriptures as written, that the Father is a person as in one of three persons but the Father specifically.
Also be prepared to answers questions in the debate. Don't run, don't evade, don't think it's just a come and say whatever and run.
Be prepared to defend yourself with responses and answers.
Pretty clear and direct but any questions, leave a comment.
PRO fulfilled his BoP by showing four different Bible verses where it it shown God is a person.
CON fails to object to this, either by challenging the interpretation or the meaning of the verses in question. Therefore, PRO's points go ignored, which means they are upheld by default - meaning he wins.
Pro brings up the imago dei, con challenges it because it’s not worded the exact way he would like; pro extends.
Bingo!
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Barney // Mod action: Not Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Pro
>Reason for Decision: see voting tab
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter points to a specific argument provided by Pro in the debate, says it's never addressed, and votes on it. Considering that Con apparently doesn't make any arguments against this, nor does he make any independent points, the vote satisfies the standards. I'll note as well that when there are three debates that are virtually identical to one another, copy-pasting the same RFD is not grounds for removal.
**************************************************
Image of a deity (God)? IDK but it seems like a reasonable guess
Does anyone in these discussions not know what the imago dei is?
You haven't answered my question for anyone and/or me to be responding to your question.
You were just writing in caps.
I apologize if the message got mistranslated.
I can't explain to why and what things sound like to other people.
That's subjective. Ask yourself why do you interpret or get the impression you get .
Why do you sound upset?
Can anyone here show it is WRITTEN, where the WORDS ARE WRITTEN?
it's like many of you don't get it when something is written as is, there is no difference of interpretation. The debate is not up for what is the correct interpretation. The debate is over what actual words are used and written.
It's like somebody knows they're defeated when they can't prove something verbatim so they evade that or move the goalpost.
It really does depend on how you view, do you consider Jesus and God different? Or do you view them the same?
Can anyone here show where it's written God is a person?