You can prove that God the Father is a person.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Pretty straightforward to prove from the biblical scriptures as written, that the Father is a person as in one of three persons but the Father specifically.
Also be prepared to answers questions in the debate. Don't run, don't evade, don't think it's just a come and say whatever and run.
Be prepared to defend yourself with responses and answers.
Pretty clear and direct but any questions, leave a comment.
Pro brings up the imago dei, and con never challenges it.
pro argues that because god created man from himself that means he is man. A terrible argument but con refuses to contest it, so argument points go to pro. I would deduct conduct points from pro, if this was a 7 point debate for accepting the same debate repeatedly instead of letting con debate an array of opponents like he obviously intended, but con did not set up the debate in a way that would let me punish pro.
You guys are really that blind as "sheeple" people believing invisibility and visibility is the same. That's what you're agreeing to saying the Spirit and a person human being is one in the same . Really.
Do not add unto his words less you be found a liar . Which many of you no doubt are from these biblical topics.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Barney // Mod action: Not Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Pro
>Reason for Decision: see voting tab
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter points to a specific argument provided by Pro in the debate, says it's never addressed, and votes on it. Considering that Con apparently doesn't make any arguments against this, nor does he make any independent points, the vote satisfies the standards. I'll note as well that when there are three debates that are virtually identical to one another, copy-pasting the same RFD is not grounds for removal.
**************************************************