There is proof that the God of the Bible is real.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
As Pro, I must meet two requirements.:
1. Prove God exists.
2. Prove the Bible is true.
Will you accept my challenge? Can you defeat me as Con?
Good luck! :)
I vote Con, here's why:
1. I don't think the Bible is true because there is no true historical testament of Jesus.
2. Ways 1-3 are all universal rules, and so should apply to God. Them not applying to God means they are wrong.
3. Way 4 is disproven because there's no evidence of design.
4. Way 5 is disproven because things don't have a preconceived purpose.
In conclusion, since Pro doesn't prove the Bible or a single reason for God to exist, I have no reason to vote Pro.
Notes for Pro
1. You need to be present in the debate.
2. Maybe look at Kirkeegard or other philosophers who say reason isn't a way you can evaluate God.
Notes for Con
I feel bad because I don't really have any. You did good.
If yall have any questions, feel free to message, comment, or question me!
Destiny determines depth dictating dialogue.
Luminescent liquidations lacking logos.
Indelible independent individiuals introspect ineffable ideas.
Experience expounds exact expressions. Extrovert each example en extrapolation.
Justifiable juxtapostions jubilate judicants
Applicants affirm adjectives adverse and adamant.
I would take it if I were Con though.
The resolution has too high a level of certainty. Plus, I'd be conflicted advocating for something I feel to be the cause of much harm in the world.
Want to debate again?
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4157-there-is-irrefutable-proof-that-the-god-of-the-bible-is-real
Bump
Bump
Hitler loved Thomas Aquinas. Saint Thomas Aquinas, the
most influential theologian in the history of the Catholic Church, argued
that it was morally justifiable for Jews to serve Christians as slaves because,
as the slayers of God, they were bound to "perpetual servitude.
Hitler exploited this legacy of hatred. But while showing continuity
with the past, Nazi anti-Semitism was different from its predecessors.
Here was not merely prejudice, persecution, and invective. Here, for the
first time, was a calculated program of mass murder set forth by the legal
government of Germany-a government unique in all history.
Well, there have always been proofs, regardless of how good they are at doing the job they are supposed to do.
Regardless.
Good luck, Sir.