Instigator / Con
1
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Topic
#4115

I will most likely live to be 200

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

PREZ-HILTON
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
7
1533
rating
18
debates
36.11%
won
Description

I think I have a better than coinflip chance of living to be 200 years old. I am 40 years old, a white male. I don't smoke. I am 5 ft 6 in and weigh approximately 190 pounds. My father died of heart disease at the age of about 55, but he also smoked 2 packs a day and was an alcoholic. My mom is 57 and has diabetes but is doing well other than the fact she smokes a pack a day and drinks a lot. My paternal grandmother died just after 70 years old, paternal grandfather at about 65 years of age both from heart related reasons. My maternal grandmother made it until about 65 but was a chronic smoker and has a lot of relatives who made it to 100, my maternal grandfather died from smoking and was about 70 he also drank heavily.
Rules
1. No kritics
2. obey the spirit of what is intended in the resolution if you misunderstood the resolution just ask in comments so we can be on the same page. You don't have to rush to accept the debate if you don't like the terms, I am more than willing to debate 2 people at a time on the same topic.
3. All citations within the debate itself. Do nont like to an external document with citations listed for you, don't put your citations in the comments so voters have to scroll potentially through 100 comments to find them. respect the voters and make the citations easy to find within the debate.
4. If you feel like we are not of equal debate skill and that you have a tremendous advantage over me, than handicap yourself by not using the letter F during the course of the debate.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Wylted uses argumentation and sources to make clear he is on a mission, to find out what Abraham Lincoln's true identity and type of being was and then to blow his brains out after having passed it onto someone worthy, in 200 years' time.

He gives us a source to prove there are time-release capsule for him to read and that it's viable. He gives us a source to prove that there was a man, however we are left to assume he tells us the truth that the man knew Wylted's father and told him the secret.

Con only tells us a lie that Wylted will live longer than 200 years, this terrible lie is proven wrong by the clone Wylted has representing himself. While it is reasonable to assume that Wylted is darth sidious and that he may well make clones and transfer his life force, it's also reasonable to assume that he will blow his brains out at the age of 200 because he is true to his mission.

I see no sufficient rebuttal from Con. Con even forfeits. Conduct to Pro.