Instigator / Pro
11
1476
rating
336
debates
40.77%
won
Topic
#4349

You cannot find a bonafide contradiction in the scriptures.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
3
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
11
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Biblical contradictions you find not. Any you think you can find or think you have found, I will attempt to debunk them as contradictions that are perceived to be.

Questions on the topic, leave them in the comments.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con needed to explain where the contradiction is in verses about Sabath. "I am not getting what the contradiction is".
The verses about "Earth" being contradictive is not true. There will always be something called Earth.
The verses about seeing God are not contradictions. "So no man has seen God . That is until the exception by the mercy of God.".
The verses about iniquity are not contradictions. "Many times when these things aren't read as written allowing the mind to presuppose, your interpretation creates the contradictions in your understanding."

Con claimed God was powerless, which was proven false. "If God is omnipotent, why was he powerless against men with iron chariots?" "In short, verse 19 in the first chapter book of Judges didn't say He was."
"We don't see the words "GOD WAS POWERLESS " in that verse. You have to add those words to read that which is called reading into the text. This is how you arrive at your phony contradictions ."

Con made a claim about "Honor thy father and thy mother" being a contradiction. Proven false. "I can strongly dislike you while keeping respect for you.".
"I'm going to show what I believe of the "hate" you're thinking about because apparently you think"hate" and honor are opposites. No, love and hate are opposites. That's why I asked which words of these verses are contradicting to you."

Pro proved that Con was unable to find contradiction in the scriptures. Therefore, Pro wins the arguments.

Pro and Con both used Bible as a source. Therefore, sources are tied.

Both Pro and Con had arguments that were easy to read. Tie in legibility.

Conduct was good in both Pro and Con.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con made some very good points. The problem with Pro's response is that

a) There is no reference for the contextual interpretation that would resolve the apparent conflicts.
b) The language is prima facia contradictory, yet Pro says you need to read it all in context. yet
c) Pro asks what are the exact words that are conflicting.

The debate topic is clear, and the answers were not complete from Pro to render the claim of conflict/contradiction resolved.