There's only one biblically valid interpretation.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
There's only one valid biblical interpretation upon reading the *words* of the biblical scriptures.
That's biblically valid, that's according to biblical words of book chapter and verse.
Any questions, please leave a comment. That includes the critics as well.
Con forfeited.
Full forfeit
I don't find it logical to use something to prove itself. In your example, you used scriptures repeatedly to prove that it only had one meaning. This approach is subjective and not objective, as it relies on the interpretation of the scriptures and requires the reader to be a believer in order to agree with your argument. It is apparent that the Bible can be interpreted in different ways, as evidenced by the use of parables. While some parts of the Bible are explicitly stated and had only one explicit meaning, others are open to interpretation, and interpretation is always subject to many perspectives. This is evidenced by the fact that many different religions have been formed from the same scripture.
I would like to be the contender of this debate; I have several things I would like to bring up that were not discussed.
bump
I accepted debate, this does not mean I believe in what I defend. I am just a crazy lunatic who accepted the debate without understanding what it meant. Sowwy.
Whoever believes the bible teaches there is more than one way to interpret it, present that scripture.
I said there is only one BIBLICALLY VALID interpretation. Not only one biblical interpretation .
"There's only one valid biblical interpretation. "
Yes. That it is false.
Contemplating on accepting.
Many different church organizations and there is only one bible for them. That's the point of this topic. One bible,one interpretation and there's many different denominations. That's poor arithmetic. They can't all be following the same book and reading something different. It's that "reading different" part.
You know the correct interpretation when you know what the scripture teaches.
And how is one supposed to know what the one and only valid interpretation is. There are as many interpretations as churches.
Amen
I am guessing that the opponent has to argue that there are two or more? I am not even sure if that would be logically possible. Because two interpretations that arrive at opposite conclusions, means one of them must be invalid.