Instigator / Pro
9
1500
rating
2
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#4394

Islam Vs Anything1

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
9
Better sources
4
6
Better legibility
2
3
Better conduct
0
3

After 3 votes and with 12 points ahead, the winner is...

Slainte
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
21
1511
rating
25
debates
68.0%
won
Description

Islam Vs Anything
Anyone can be my opponent who is from any religion or atheist nothing else, like some random person who just oppose Islam.
Rules:
1 Evidence from anywhere but must be credible.
2 Use philosophy, science or meta physics as far it's logical and make sense.
3 No insult to Islam, and our beliefs.
4 No forfeit (if then automatic defeat)
5 Spelling and grammar should not affect result or voting and I should have relaxation for that as English is not my first language.
6 First round for deciding about what we are going to debate about as follows:
Your belief,
Topic
Resolution
Your stance
Etc
7 Burden of proof is shared.
8 Anyone can accept defeat in the middle of debate.
9 No trolling
10 No vote Bomb
Thanks, and looking forward for good debates (in sha Allah)

-->
@Bella3sp

https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533-islam-vs-anything2
you need to access the link from here as well for the debate

-->
@Slainte

What do you mean by this?

-->
@tigerlord

I forfeit. Please round up the votes to take this.

We already got warning about that, and we stopped.

-->
@Barney

I also report tigerlord and lancelot's posts. please read and let me know if you deem them to all obey the rules, ty.

-->
@RationalMadman

I am quite glad the reports panel will not be flooded with all those.

For starters, BrotherD is already banned for the behavior to which you are attempting to raise our awareness. Reporting old posts of his from prior to a ban, is incredibly unlikely to be productive.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame
@oromagi

I cannot click any flags as you removed my flag function.

I report all this comments sections almost, except Slainte's posts.

Ty.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

LOL, so far I have seen all childish moves you can do. You are immature. You can just play emotional games. Your best weapon is mockery, which works on a few, but not for me.
We have not argued with each other. And the last debate I did, arguments wise, I was winning.
The desperate condition of Con in this debate and his frustration and crying about comment section shows, how frustrated he was. But he had the support of his filthy, biased friends.
Being agnostic, he has chosen to take the stance of Buddhism and when got defeated he ran to atheism. And he was inviting his filthy friends to vote for what was in his mind and never bother to present in the debate. This debate shows ho lowly and how less IQ you guys have and how dishonest you guys are. I would have cancelled your vote, bomb. But rule no 4 already gave you immunity that is why you can get away with it, but never try to do this for any of my other debates.
If you want to have a discussion with me, come in private message. On the other hand, you are that much dumb to not know when someone is debating he must not talk about it to give clues in advance. I helped so many guys for their debate in comment section. That DDO guys put a rule to not help debaters in comment section LOL. Do you think I will do it for my own debate?
You are dumber than what I thought. Or you are trying to be over smart to take advantage of it?

-->
@tigerlord

You’re too short-sighted for any rational discussion, so you fled the debate.
Probably your wisest move so far.

In a debate against me, you’ll do the same. Run while you still have the chance.
Don’t bitch and mope. Lose with humility and grace.

hahahahah, you want to debate with me in comment section?
You are no more than that, thomas. Who can debate in forum or comment section. Why not accept the debate, then?
You lowly filth.
If you want to argue, then come to debate. What you said, there is debate already about that topic. But low intellect can not understand it at all.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I can see your frustration from the recent vote bomb. I have mentioned it in debate and in comment sections as well that if a voter goes for rule number 4 I can't stop it. Because your dear slainte was too scared to mutually agree on dropping round 2 to have fair and square debate and was able to win debate.
You are also coward who put lame excuses to make the debate ranking. You do not dare to accept it. Because you will be destroyed. This time I will put the argument within a window of 1 week. And I will see who dare to vote bomb on it. Because i will not leave that chance at all in sha Allah.
Stop throwing garbage out of yourself.
slainte himself is tard and ban manner guy and sir idiot too. And you complain to me to be like that?
You saw the first Muslim to be above your level. If you have met idiot Muslims in your whole life, it's not my fault. Your mumbo jumbo science is infant right now. And it was born through Islam.
To understand a little, about what I am saying, check my video about how atheism got into us.

-->
@tigerlord

BTW, you belong to a religion that endorses pedophilia and bestiality.

-->
@tigerlord

This sounds like a very emotional way of coming to terms with defeat, but whatever mental gymnastics is required to process it is better for everyone involved.

You won’t waste your time because you are a lost cause.

I challenge you to come up with a single argument that’s intelligible.

There is debate instigated, which open challenged. But your low IQ can't comprehend that I am not running, but I have put an open challenge for any tard to accept.

you are dumb people, you called yourself animals and your ancestors are animals. what can i aspect from you. you say having sex with sublings and ancestors is no problem at all. Survival of fittest is your excuses when shows hostilities.
You and your intellect is garbage.

kid u sucks on debates, i have seen you, there were many who were more better, way much better than you, but they also forfeited. i am not saying i am high and might but the one who is my creator is. you can do filth in comment section. you debate would be just like slainte. Who is garbage. you all are garbage. why putting excuses. i wont do anything which will waste my time, i tried to edit the debate but it seems it cant be changed to rating right now. and i not going to close it and then make new ranting one. if you want then accept it. otherwise get lost.
when you lose you target like that.
Garbage can only spread filth, no good come from garbage.

You can’t debate or defend your beliefs, so you RAN. Lol!

You lack courage, consistency, and intelligence.

-->
@tigerlord

Quit avoiding me.
Stop being such a scared loser.

I will dismantle this Islamic garbage scripture in the discussion, so you can see for yourself how stupid it is.

A mad dog releasing his frustration though vote bomb. LOL

You gave him resources points as well for his broken links? This shows how dishonest and filth you are.

Team of cowards, who vote bomb for each others.

Stay and defend Islam this time too.

Don’t forfeit.

-->
@tigerlord

Like you have anything else to do.
Switch it from Standard to Rated, then I’ll accept.

Try not to whine as badly as you did in the comments section. I get that you’re incapable of defending your religion of violence, but you’ll try and fail just like you did this time.

hahahah, babies from eggs. Now you started this?
Empty utensils make a lot of noise.
You've got nothing, just what you are doing now. And for this I do not have time. I started another debate. Have guts accept.

Tigerlord is wisely avoiding Slainte because he doesn’t have the brain cells to match him.

-->
@tigerlord

Tigerlord, stop running.

Keep crying about your hypocrisy. It was your own rule that no forfeits were allowed. Your fragile mind was too slow to come up with a counter-argument, so you forfeited.

And now you can’t accept your self-made defeat. LOL!

You have embarrassed Islam. Allah didn’t send his best.

.

TIGERLORD, AKA, "PAPER TIGER," QUOTE TO SLAINTE IN GOING AGAINST ISLAM AGAIN AND HIS GOAT-HUMPER GOD ALLAH!!!!: “Get lost you idiot, I am done with you. You do not deserve my attention. Just never accept any debate with me."

Key phrase in tigerlords quote above; "Just never accept any debate with me."

What the camel herder pseudo-muslim "Paper Tiger" still doesn't understand AGAIN in front of the membership, is the FACT that he cannot debate anymore upon this Debate Religion Forum because HE ADMITTED that the toilet paper Quran does not allow him to DEBATE or ARGUE anything about his stinking religion of Islam, as embarrassingly shown in this link AGAIN: https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53908

Therefore, let us all say "good bye and good-reddance" to "Paper Tiger," where he represented one of the most Quran Stupid and SCARDY CAT pseudo-muslims that this Religion Forum has ever seen, especially in that could not address the REAL ISLAM that I have shown him in this "comment section," but only to RUN AWAY from it and hide in embarrassment! LOL!

.

-->
@Slainte

Get lost you idiot, I am done with you. You do not deserve my attention. Just never accept any debate with me.

-->
@tigerlord

I did say ypu acted poorly im yhe comment section. I also said i dont think that reglects who ypy truly are.

If the response window was 3 days, i would have agreed. It was 2 weeks. That is not me taking advantage. That is ypu falling on the knife of ypur own procrastination.

Winning is not mt concern. See where votes are against me and I thank the judges for their thought and time.

You erred in not circling back and addressing my issue. I do know how debates are done and I have chosen unwinnable sides

Whilst I said I would not want to debate you again, I will do it. Follow the rules and be clear. It is up to you. I hope whatever life anger ypu are suffering from which is feeding your vitriol gets resolved soon.

-->
@Slainte

Little brother you are funny, you left debate saying i am a bad guy and have done bad in comment section. i was not supposed to continue the debate, as you did not have the manner to spare someone's condition because of inevitable circumstances. i asked you in private message that can you skip round 2. but you took advantage of something which was out of my hand. tbh i lost interest debating with u as well. you were very desperate to win, even wanted to take advantage of rule 4. Which was actually put to let not people leave debate without any reason and have good conduct. While you took it for your advantage and served it for opposite.
What you call your punch was dealt in earlier arguments, if you had read about it. You really do not know how a debate is done.
You picked Buddhism as your stance, not atheism. Even then I dealt both ideas in 3rd round.
But it's shame none you and voter read that.
see how you ruin the debate, your emotional mumbo jumbo, and also crying.
you call it a debate?
it is just like that debate which i did on DDO. kingdebator ruin it same way. but then he challenged me into another debate and where he run away and forfeited in 3rd round.

.
LAUGHABLY, TIGERLORD, AKA, "PAPER TIGER" SAID THIS TOWARDS ME: "Admin do something about this, thomas. Ban him. Why he is not banned yet?"
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53820

The goat-herder pseudo-muslim tigerlord doesn't understand that if I was banned, then who would point out his OUTRIGHT LYING ISLAMIC NATURE in his initial post of this debate with Slainte, where I called him out to additional despicable FACTS about his camel-humping faith of Islam as shown in this link: https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53598

Gee, I wonder why, as shown in the link above, that tigerlord didn't want to talk about Muslim men being able to BEAT THEIR WIVES, and that stinking Muslim men can MARRY PREPUBESCENT LITTLE GIRLS, that cannot even have babies, but yet said men can SCREW them as pedophiles, and the ritual that young girls WILL HAVE THEIR CLITORIS CUT OFF because they are not to enjoy sex, and that BABY SEX IS ALLOWED by Muslim men!!!! How despicable can the Islam religion get in the 21st century?!

As shown in this "comment section," tigerlord is STILL RUNNING AWAY SCARED and hiding from the FACTS shown above regarding his pathetic Islam!

.

.

TIGERLORD, AKA, “PAPER TIGER,” QUOTE THAT IS DIRECTLY GOING AGAINST HIS STINKING ISLAM RELIGION: “If he does that on my other debates, then it would be a problem.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53837

BUT, wait! According to “Paper Tiger,” he ADMITS that he cannot be in any future debates upon this esteemed DEBATE Religion Forum because of this quote he made in post #74: “Otherwise, it would be wastage of time, Quran has forbid us to debate or argue ..…”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53713

Since “Paper Tiger” says he cannot debate or argue anymore about his despicable camel humping Islam faith, THEN HE IS DONE here on DEBATEART Religion forum, period!

.
Again, to further substantiate that “Paper Tiger” is not to debate again within this Religion Forum, here are his superiors saying the same thing as shown below:

1. أَنَا زَعِيمٌ بِبَيْتٍ فِي رَبَضِ الْجَنَّةِ لِمَنْ تَرَكَ الْمِرَاءَ وَإِنْ كَانَ مُحِقًّا
"I guarantee a house on the outskirts of Paradise for one who abandons arguments even if he is right."
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4800, Grade: Sahih

2. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُوَرِّثُ الضَّغائِنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge hardens the heart and produces resentment.”

Source: al-Madkhal ilá al-Sunan al-Kubrá 178
3. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُؤَثِّرُ الضَّغْنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge causes the heart to harden and breeds hatred."
Source: Jāmi’ al-‘Ulūm wal-Ḥikam 1/248

4. الْمِرَاءُ وَالْجِدَالُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَذْهَبُ بِنُورِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ قَلْبِ الرَّجُلِ
Disputation and arguments about sacred knowledge cause the light of knowledge to extinguish in a man’s heart."
Malik ibn Anas, may Allah have mercy on him.

.
Furthermore AGAIN, if the pseudo-muslim tigerlord goes against his foul smelling Islamic faith and debates again, THEN HE IS A HYPOCRITE to his faith, as he admitted too because he said the toilet paper Quran says that he can’t debate or argue his sickening faith, then his camel-humper Allah God has plans for him upon his earthly demise as shown herewith:

1. A well-known Hadith says, “Among the signs of a HYPOCRITE are three, even if he fasts and prays and claims to be a Muslim: WHEN HE SPEAKS, HE LIES; when he gives a promise, he breaks it; and when he is trusted with an amana, he betrays” (Sahih al-Bukhari 33, Sahih Muslim 59)

2. “The HYPOCRITES, they are in the lowest pit of Hellfire”. The lower is the hell fire, the tougher is gets. Allah (swt) has reserved the lower pits of hell fire for hypocrites [In Surah Al-Munafiqoon, Allah (SWT)].

3. An-Nifaq Al-Akbar:
"It is when the external appearance of the person is having full belief on Allah, His book, His messengers and His angels as well as the day of judgement. But this person conceals within his real thoughts that negates all or some of these facts. Out Prophet (PBUH) was confronted with HYPOCRITES which are referred by Allah as the ones that are in the lowest depths of the hell-fire. “

4. حَسْبُهُمْ ۚ وَلَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ ۖ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌۭ مُّقِيمٌۭ ٦٨
"Allah has promised the HYPOCRITES, both men and women, and the disbelievers an everlasting stay in the Fire of Hell—it is sufficient for them. Allah has condemned them, and they will suffer a never-ending punishment." (Quran 9:68.)

Besides the above FACTS that explicitly show that “Paper Tiger” IS NOT TO DEBATE ANYMORE UPON THIS FORUM, because he turns into a HYPOCRITE if he does, then Jesus and I will have to correct him once again relating to the ramifications of his sickening Islamic faith, praise Jesus!

.

-->
@Barney
@Sir.Lancelot

.
Sir.Lancelot, Barney,

After reading your posts, you assume that I am a "Troll?" Huh?

TROLL DEFINITION: In slang, a troll is a person who posts or makes inflammatory, insincere, digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages online, or in real life, with the intent of provoking others into displaying emotional responses, or manipulating others' perception, thus acting as a bully or a provocateur. Wikipedia

.
How can I allegedly be called a TROLL relative to the strongly critical definition shown above, whereas addressing said points of being a TROLL shown above do not relate to me whatsoever as shown below:

INFLAMMATORY: If my Jesus can be inflammatory in His Temple episode by setting an example of this act to Christians, then I am proud to act in the same manner, praise! (John 2:13:17)

INSINCERE: I am NOT insincere regarding the goat-herder pseudo-muslim tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," in that I have shown that he LIED in his opening statement regarding his disgusting camel humper Islamic faith because he did not include the SICKENING AND DISGUSTING PARTS of his faith that I have shown in the following link: https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53598

DIGRESSIVE: I was NOT digressive because I stayed on the topic of how despicable and sickening the Islamic faith truly is, period!

EXTRANEOUS: Every part of my posts were vital to the conversation of how ugly the religion of Islam represents itself!

OFF TOPIC: I was NEVER off topic in making tigerlord the Muslim fool that he is relating to his CRY BABY attitude towards his debate not going the way he expected it to be!

PROVOKING OTHERS: In a debate where tiglerlord LIED, then I had to provoke him to address this FACT, but he couldn’t, other than to RUN AWAY from this fact with “little boy” lame excuses, and then went into hiding!

MANIPULATING OTHERS PERCEPTION: I NEVER had to manipulate others thinking, where it was easy to see in how dastardly the religion of Islam truly is in the first place, as I have explicitly shown at tigerlords "Ahab the Arab's" embarrassing expense! 2+2=4.

BULLY OR PROVOCATEUR: How can I be a bully or provocateur when the facts of Islam shown by me in the "comment section" are what they are, and that tigerlord RAN AWAY from and went into hiding because he was too SCARED to even try and address them!

.
I cannot help it if the goat-herder Muslim named tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," did not give his FULL definition of his camel-humper Islamic belief in his opening statement to the debate he has lost! Whereas, I did give the drastic and sickening OTHER FACTS about his faith as dastardly shown in my post #67 herewith: https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53598

.

-->
@tigerlord

Savant made clear his RFD.

I stated, at the end of Round 4, which you admit to not having seen:

"I find it very difficult to believe that a philosophical system that micromanages ones life is :the best". At the core, certain religions and philosophical positions are designed to be a type of indentured servitude, where the work in your is for the benefit of a deity or prophet, be-it God, Allah, Mohammad, Jesus, Mary, Shiva, Vishnu etc.

I have shown a system that does not require servitude. Pro's list of Islamic features is not an argument about why it is the best. "

Sometimes you can win a debate on a single punch, and notwithstanding the forfeit rule, I landed the punch. You never even responded to it, therefore you conceded that point, and the judge felt it was a winning statement.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I wonder why he turned that way, probably he did debates after me. I did around 2012 and 13

-->
@Barney

Brother, I know my auto loss rule. If voter had mentioned that, I would accept. But he's simply doing vote bomb and considering me loose debate on the basis of argument.
If he does that on my other debates, then it would be a problem. I do not care about this debate, as the rule was set by me. But him saying I lost over arguments without good RFD is not acceptable.
He can keep the points in the same way, but must give just RFD and honest as well.

-->
@tigerlord

BrotherD.Thomas was one of the Top Debaters on DDO before he turned to trolling.

This guy, not debating. And a debating website is where intellectual people have good conversation and arguments with each other. Trolling destroy the good vibes of this platform.
i am a serious debater. But these kinds of people causing us to leave.
do you want to loose people who really do debates over those who just troll?
This happened with DDO. do you want to repeat it again? Also the bugs in that website.

He is committing blasphemy.
if you wont do something about it then we have instructions, and i must follow them.
وَإِذَا رَأَيْتَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَخُوضُونَ فِىٓ ءَايَـٰتِنَا فَأَعْرِضْ عَنْهُمْ حَتَّىٰ يَخُوضُوا۟ فِى حَدِيثٍ غَيْرِهِۦ ۚ وَإِمَّا يُنسِيَنَّكَ ٱلشَّيْطَـٰنُ فَلَا تَقْعُدْ بَعْدَ ٱلذِّكْرَىٰ مَعَ ٱلْقَوْمِ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِي٦٨
When you see those who indulge in (blaspheming) Our verses, turn away from them until they become occupied with some other discourse. If Satan should cause you to forget (this instruction), then do not sit with the unjust people after recollection.

-->
@Barney

I kinda like BrotherD.Thomas!

-->
@tigerlord

Oh regarding vote #1, I have passed your concerns to the other moderators. However, due to it both covering a decent amount of debate content and mentioning the auto loss rule, it is unlikely to be taken down. Were it taken down, the voter could recast minus everything other than the rule violation; so removing it seems frivolous to me.

-->
@tigerlord

In online discourse, you should expect trolls. The best policy is to not feed the trolls. If you choose to feed the trolls, then the conversation with one becomes consensual; if you do not engage with one, then any stalkerish behavior becomes something moderators may intercede against.

-->
@tigerlord

Because he hasn’t broken any rules.

Admin do something about this, thomas. Ban him. Why he is not banned yet?

-->
@Sir.Lancelot
@tigerlord

.
PaperTiger, "the baby talk Muslim" as shown herewith: "For it is blah-blah upon blah-blah, blah-blah upon blah-blah, gah-gah upon gah-gah, gah-gah upon gah-gah, a little here, a little there." https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53453

SIR.LANCELOT QUOTE TO YOU: "We debate, with Judges’ decision. All the voters selected will be muslim."

All voters will be "Ahab the Arabs," where this premise is the ONLY WAY you can perceivably win a debate! LOL!

DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT forget about my post #98 shown below where if you debate another time in this forum, YOU ARE A BLATANT HYPOCRITE in the eyes of your camel-fu*ker Allah God, AND, what will be done to you upon your demise in going to HELL, praise Allah's revenge upon goat-herder Muslims like YOU!

.

-->
@tigerlord

.
PaperTiger, "the baby talk Muslim" as shown herewith: "For it is blah-blah upon blah-blah, blah-blah upon blah-blah, gah-gah upon gah-gah, gah-gah upon gah-gah, a little here, a little there." https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53453

QUIT YOUR "CRY-BABY CRYING," ITS OVER, YOU LOST THE DEBATE AT THIS TIME, UNDERSTOOD!? GET ON YOUR CAMEL AND RIDE OFF INTO THE SUNSET, YOU ARE DONE!!!

Now, read my post #84 again, where you ADMIT that your toilet paper Quran doesn't allow you to DEBATE your goat-humper Islam religion, remember Muslim fool?! Therefore, YOU ARE DONE IN THIS DEBATE FORUM! https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53783

.
Now, if you go against your sickening Islamic faith again and debate In this forum, "THEN YOU ARE A BLATANT HYPOCRITE" in the eyes of Islam and your camel fu*ker Allah God, and the following is what is to be done with you, WHERE CAN YOU SMELL THE SULFUR LAKES OF HELL? .... LOL!

1. A well-known Hadith says, “Among the signs of a hypocrite are three, even if he fasts and prays and claims to be a Muslim: when he speaks, he lies; when he gives a promise, he breaks it; and when he is trusted with an amana, he betrays” (Sahih al-Bukhari 33, Sahih Muslim 59)

2. “The HYPOCRITES, they are in the lowest pit of Hellfire”. The lower is the hell fire, the tougher is gets. Allah (swt) has reserved the lower pits of hell fire for hypocrites [In Surah Al-Munafiqoon, Allah (SWT)].

3. An-Nifaq Al-Akbar:
"It is when the external appearance of the person is having full belief on Allah, His book, His messengers and His angels as well as the day of judgement. But this person conceals within his real thoughts that negates all or some of these facts. Out Prophet (PBUH) was confronted with HYPOCRITES which are referred by Allah as the ones that are in the lowest depths of the hell-fire. "

4. حَسْبُهُمْ ۚ وَلَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ ۖ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌۭ مُّقِيمٌۭ ٦٨
"Allah has promised the HYPOCRITES, both men and women, and the disbelievers an everlasting stay in the Fire of Hell—it is sufficient for them. Allah has condemned them, and they will suffer a never-ending punishment." (Quran 9:68.)

.
Tigerlord, aka, Papier Tiger, you act as though everyone is a STUPID as you are, where you're supposed to get a FREE RIDE and continue to debate in this prestigious DEBATE Forum, where after your pathetic debate skills, AND you admitting that you are not to go against your faith and DEBATE again, you have no business in being here in the first place!

.
NEXT MUSLIM FOOL LIKE "TIGERLORD" THAT ADMITS HE IS NOT TO BE ON THIS RELIGION FORUM IN DEBATES BECAUSE OF HIS TOILET PAPER QURAN SAYS SO, BUT IS THINKING TO DEBATE AGAIN AS A "HYPOCRITE" TO HIS GOAT-HUMPER ISLAM'S DIRECT RULES NOT TO, WILL BE ......?

.

Going to record this debate for YouTube as well.

-->
@Barney

I saw airmax account with same profile picture with tiny devil lol.
But seems he is not active.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

That would be awesome.
We can do that, surely.

i am not upset. probably you do.
i told you many times it is normal course of actions.
i faced jury about my vote in 2012 on DDO. where i voted against nakashmatwadi. 1 vote with 7 points in the favour of a muslim guy while 7 votes against him.
my 1 single vote is still standing there if there would be database for that debate somewhere.
can you imagine?
why?
Because my vote was just. And i had to do a lengthy debate with that person who admitted my vote to be just and not vote bomb. and jury did not let me until he admitted himself.
so do not be upset.
i am doing which normally happens in debates.
for my rule number 4 i accept it with open arms but not for arguments. Which is vote bomb.