Society is dysfunctional

Society has, up to this point, proved to be driven upon social reaction rather than proaction. Whether that would be through wars or using idealistic mental beliefs that suspend logic in order to cope with the fear of being abandoned by society. 

While there seems to be a trend that the degree of volatility has decreased through history, false mental beliefs are still at large. For example, in the Western World, Feminism, which, by the movements name itself implies that it desires superiority over the male counterpart, has largely been an excuse for a majority of women in western culture to begin pushing anti-social behaviours as social. Such as sexual promiscuity as being a freedom of expression rather than a manipulative strategy to gain social power. The only reason ideologies like this exist is due to the systematic oppression that once existed in the past, just like the enslavement of Africans by the West. However, there no longer exists systematic oppression of either of these two social groups and therefore, fixating on people who are potentially showing a similar belief in the aforementioned, now abolished systems, shows nothing less than an effort to socially intimidate. Anti-social behaviours aren’t exclusive to a gender or ethnicity, so protesting against a sub-category of anti-social behaviour or a victim of anti-social behaviour indicates nothing less than someone who is actively using said anti-social behaviours to quell their own paranoia.

Every human is born with the intent of being socially proactive. It is only when one is met with another who shows that they’re unwilling to be proactive, specifically those who are closest to them in their life, that they belief in the notion that being reactive is more beneficial to their cause of preventing social exile. 

Society is dysfunctional

a

: not functioning properly : marked by impaired or abnormal functioning

b

: characterized by abnormal or unhealthy interpersonal behavior or interaction

Society deviates from the social norm.

The whole basis of your counter argument is that we need another society in order to compare it the ones that exist on earth? 

It is entirely possible for societies to be dysfunctional, and exactly is the case with all that currently and have existed, due to the fact that anti-social behaviours persist in them. 

is social normality, or what is deemed as normal based upon the most common behaviour within society, is what you deem to be functional or right? 

I’m not sure if you’re involved in debates for the right reason, your debate history and biography do not illicit the interests of someone trying to understand the opposing party to reach a solution to the topic presented, moreover to deflect away and come up with abstract interpretations in the hopes that you ‘win’ the debate.

Since you’ve freely admitted that you’re not in this debate for a solution to the topic, I’m not entirely sure if persisting forward is of worth to either of us.

Dysfunctional - Definition: not operating normally or properly. 

Alternative definition: unable to deal adequately with normal social relations.

None of my previous points contradict either of these two definitions relative to the subject of discussion.

Being anti-social is a social abnormality, of which I have already stated, no one is born being. It’s not in one’s own interest or societies interest to be so, however much said an anti-social individual would believe so. 

You seem to be wholly misunderstanding of what it is I am trying to portray. A car can be faulty just like a human can be. Just because a human is anti-social doesn’t mean they’re any less human but it does make them a less optimal person. 

unable to deal adequately with normal social relations.

• The society cannot be "not normal" because it is the entire collection of individuals and if the societal norm shifts, it is still "normal".
  
• Society cannot engage in social relations, let alone be inadequate in so, even if individuals could.
  
• Therefore, the topic statement is proven wrong.

whether you’re in this debate for a solution or to argue for arguments sake. 

If you’d taken five minutes out of your day to look up ‘dysfunctional’ as a term, you would have likely found my source, which is by Oxford Languages.

Archivist: How can we help you?

Me: I have a historical copy of this book written by the original author himself.

Archivist: And where is it?

Me: Well, if you have the time to scrutinize my house, you would have found it.

Journal: You forgot to properly cite this published paper on your paper right here, you need to correct this mistake before I can consider publishing it.

Me: It is a well-known study that everyone knows about, if you know any better, you should be able to look it up for yourself instead of whining!

Society: the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community.

Dysfunctional: not operating normally or properly.

I’ve stated before, that humans aren’t born to be anti-social and that it’s a learned behaviour.

By me saying that the majority of people, and the way societies systems function, are inherently anti-social, does not contradict or invalidate the title.