Instigator / Pro
21
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Topic
#4467

Legends Darth Vader is more powerful than Eren Yeager with the Founding Titan.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
0
Better sources
6
4
Better legibility
3
2
Better conduct
3
1

After 3 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...

Sir.Lancelot
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
20,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
1,500
Contender / Con
7
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Description

I realize this is an odd character match-up.

This debate will be considered on-balance.

So this version of Darth Vader is from Legends, but more of a hypothetical Vader. This debate assumes Vader is completely organic (with the exception of his right prosthetic arm.) and fully potentialized.

Up against Season 4 Eren Yeager with all the powers of the Founding Titan (Strongest version of Eren in the series.)

This debate will consider the term ‘Powerful’ to have two contexts, and both will be considered in the debate with equal importance.:

1st definition.: Powerful- Capability of exerting great force or overcoming strong resistance.

2nd definition.: Powerful, as in who’s more likely to overcome who in a fight to the death.

Basic References for Pro & Con:

Pro- https://deadliestfiction.fandom.com/wiki/Darth_Vader_(Legends)

Con-https://attackontitan.fandom.com/wiki/Founding_Titan

Rules:
1. BOP is shared.

2. Sources and evidence can be used from any Star Wars or Attack on Titan lore. But the strength of the evidence will be graded on the accuracy of the source.

3. Voters with knowledge on both characters may share their knowledge or feedback as to how they would counter the resolution, but ultimately, all votes must be non-biased and judge only based on the arguments provided.

4. One forfeit is the loss of a conduct point. Two are an autoloss.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

That’s a shame. I think there’s an argument to be had here, even if it’s a little wonky given how these worlds work so differently. Still, full forfeit and concession give the debate to Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full honourable concession.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

full forefit?!?!!?