Hey thanks for making this into a debate. This is rather unique and step away from hot topics. Looks like it can be fun.
I am open to any sort of definition being used and will assume/use webster-marriam definitions unless stated otherwise. I have a few questions before getting into the grit.
I'll use a number system to break conversation down into parts and provide quotes as needed for easy reading.
1. It is my firm belief that history books of each country should be made available on the internet for free.
To confirm, are we looking only at history books or do we consider books on sociology or culture that may not be categorized as history despite serving the same purpose? Like magazines or news medias.
Can the internet be censored in any way or should we consider the internet to be open to everyone as well?
2. I believe this since it can be used to understand the perspectives of every side when a conflict occurs between countries.
Although reading the history, cultures, and lifestyle of a country can help us understand some parts, hownmay it help us understand current events?
Can dialogue exist between conflicting countries that depict the same message with out books or history?
3. almost all history books/documents online are behind a paywall or outright banned from a country?
I agree and disagree.
I have found this an issue with many studies or articles I try to use. The worst is the news agencies or what ever website requiring subscriptions. There is a cost in maintaining servers and an online presence to allow an audience. Have you considered what it would take to digitize all history books in the world?
Here is an article about an entity that is trying or has tried to digitize all books (or most) for free. This article highlights a few challenges that has been experienced.
Do we need to consider challenges to your goal in order to justify doing it or deciding not to? In other words....to you... how does these challenges support a pro or con stance?
4. Countries seem to cover history with conflicting or different information. Adding their own misinformation. Do you see this as a barrier or challenge for your position?
Those are historically valuable. That said, you should have in every right defined what "history book" is.
Are you saying confidential recordings that are historical like recently released documents on u.f.o.'s or confidential files that happen to be about historical recordings that may be open to the public?
Confidential files about recorded history are, indeed history books. Now try to make them free. I dare you. Even if you really dare to do so, I bet that agents in more than one country will be out there to get you. And if you really do that, you--as the one who basically stole information--are the guilty one, not the agents protecting them.