Instigator / Pro
2
1421
rating
18
debates
22.22%
won
Topic
#4487

Prove your opponent needs to touch grass

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
2
4

After 4 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Bella3sp
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1524
rating
51
debates
75.49%
won
Description

This debate is a certified League of Legends moment

-->
@Bella3sp

Well that's just me being ignorant of pop culture.

-->
@Savant

Hah, it's a person from a video game. Don't think i've mentioned anyone from a video game or anime, but good to know outside perspectives.

-->
@Bella3sp

I kind of assumed from your profile picture

-->
@Savant

Now that I really look at the votes.. Should I be asking why you think I'm a weeb?

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

My bad, didn't see this until now. I will most likely be creating anything revolving around controversies with woman, controversial opinions about homosexuals and standardized testing.

-->
@Bella3sp

What topics do you feel strongly about?

We can debate them as many times as you like (Unrated.). I can be Pro or Con on any of them.

Alternatively, I can debate them with someone else and you can vote on them.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I considered. However it would slightly be inefficient. Though it would help with their opinions, it doesn't completly help me ackknowledge about the opposing side. I would rather get into a debate already confident with the pros or cons about the opposing side. Further, it seems I only cover some issues rather than underlining the main or not quite known issues.

However, I'll consider a bit more and might try it out.

-->
@Bella3sp

There’s actually a quicker and easier way, I believe.

If you wanted to be able to firmly debate topics you feel strongly about. I’d say choose 1-2 topics and create unrated debates, then debate them once or twice.

I was out of my league debating socialism-capitalism, but re-doing a few debates on the subject made me feel comfortable talking about them.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

It's temporary.

I want to do more research on my stronger opinions and constructing. Such as standerized testing, I will come back fully acknowledged on the pros and cons and recreate the debate. Then, i'll focus more on those opinions and constructing the correct frameworks.

-->
@Bella3sp

Are you leaving because you’re bored of DART or a separate reason?

-->
@Intelligence_06

As he turns off his gaming computer the projection of the indoor grass fades away.

-->
@Mharman

I never said that it wasn't OK to have them lol. It just makes it funnier.

-->
@Intelligence_06

Bruh it’s a troll debate, there’s gonna be fallacies :P

-->
@Bella3sp

The millionaire's kid with an indoor garden smiles and carefully puts sleep to his gaming PC.

-->
@Intelligence_06

I wasn't going to go through the statistics of "grass is..." or "touching is..", I didn't take this debate seriously in anyway. I wasn't going to provide defintions when this was a troll debate. I even showed a picture of grass LOL. That's my way of defining it. It was used in the context of "you don't know what grass looks like, so go ahead look at this picture and go outside and touch it".

If you're going far into the statistics, think about the entire thing revolving around touching grass. (Aka, it's translated to telling someone to go outside). This debate is giving "reasons" why someone needs to touch grass. Like being a discord moderator, you need to go outside, do something with your life, touch some grass. It's all the humor in it.

So, whatever you call my side of the debating is fine. I wasn't looking to impress with this.

Just realized that my stats look probably like Mharman's as well. Good thing that my dad just bought a pot of herbaceous plant so now I don't even need to go out to touch grass.

Ad hominem and a Tu Quoque. LMAO

Just to show you that proving such is an impossible feat. The best arguments involve bashing the other side, just like in the politics. Really a topic where no theoretical objective argument exists.

Lol