Instigator / Pro
2
1482
rating
24
debates
41.67%
won
Topic
#4503

Roasting Competition

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
2
1

After 3 votes and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Devon
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

You have to come up with some pretty funny roasts against your opponent. Go for the jugular. May the best person win.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro: sometimes hard to connect with provided meanings or sentences. Although there was more content, quality is more important

Con: sometimes less is better. Especially if everything is said right. Overall responses were easier to understand.

Evaluation: con wins

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

R1 roasts were definitely good on both ends, but I think Con's response to Pro's roasts in basically all subsequent rounds were lacking a bit more depth when expecting a comeback from Pro's roasts. Win to Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

RND 1: Unimpressive by both, just because Pro wrote more, does not make it more cutting. Very hard to read. - Tie
RND 2:: Pro has a few quips that are funny. Nothing unique, however, I did chuckle. Con falls hard with one retort. - Pro
RND 3: Pro not impressive, yet Con fails to show.. - See Round 4.
RND 4: Pro extends, so I have to look at RND 3 and 4 together. Cons' comeback to Pro's round 3 was not impressive. On the balance, Pro takes the rounds.
RND 5: Cons response to Pro was not vicious enough.

Pro takes it.