Instigator / Pro
28
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4607

people who actually spend time on this site are degenerates

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
12
15
Better sources
8
10
Better legibility
4
5
Better conduct
4
5

After 6 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
Two hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
35
1309
rating
274
debates
40.51%
won
Description

no i don't want to enter a full description

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither addressed the resolution.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither side defined 'degenerate' nor discussed things relevant to the topic.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Troll debate so my vote goes to Con because maybelotus was clearly not thinking straight in coming onto DART just to bitch about others being on this website having debates and/or discussions.

Con, whether true or not, had a good comeback. So, he is winner winner chicken dinner!!!

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro's reasons are personal, subjective and emotion-driven. Con has given approximately half of a reason that is irrelevant to the topic. So neither did anything productive. Tie.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I think pro's arguments can be considered to be counted towards the burden, but at the same time, not really?...

But assuming this was a troll debate, I laughed a little more on pro's part. Though con's comment was a bit funny as well.

As for how I graded my vote, points wise, the standard was basically acting as winner's choice.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Troll debate so my vote goes to Con because maybelotus is stupid for coming on this website to argue anyone for being on this website.