Male Circumcision
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 5,500
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Resolution
"Male circumcision should be done more often than not"
Interpretation
This means pro must prove that males should mostly (at least 51% of the time) get a circumcision.
Rules
1. Use MLA citations the following cite can help if you don't know how to make them yourself https://www.citationmachine.net/mla
The reason for this is so neither party has to be paranoid about malicious links. I am already doing a great deal to use citations from English sources, the least my opponent can do is use MLA citations.
According to a study of 1500 men, circumcised males experienced less intense orgasms, received less pleasure during sex and most surprisingly of all were more likely to experience pain, numbness or tingling sensations due to lack of circulation.
Cut penis looks weird
- Appearance
- Hygiene
- Decreased risk of infection
- Enhanced sexual pleasure
American women are fat and ugly. Maybe circumcised penis looks good to them but russian women are prettier, and we are used to real men who have their entire penis intact. If you want a fat American woman, good for you but I say you should strive to be with pretty girls like me, and bot sell yourself short.
if you get one as an adult and the risks as an adult are even worse than for babies.
- Hygiene. Easier to keep private area clean. Yes you can still be dirty circumcised but the chances are lower as it's easier to clean. The foreskin can trap bacteria causing irritation and skin issues. Even uncircumcised men can still be clean it's all based on your hygiene but for circumcised men it's less work.
- Male babies are susceptible to UTI them if they aren't cleaned properly or spent too much time in the same diaper. Studies have shown that baby boys who are circumcised may be more protected because there's less of an area for bacteria to get trapped and as they grow older, they might be protected from other serious conditions. STI's are a major problem for both men and women and you never know when a partner might be carrying a virus that can range from an uncomfortable personal situation to a deadly pathogen. The foreskin makes it more likely that bacteria, viruses or fungi would get trapped and travel from one partner to another including HIV.
- Studies have proven that circumcised men may have an added layer of protection and it may even prevent cancer because STI and infections of the genital area can lead to cervical cancer for women, it's considered healthier for women to have sex with circumcised partners who are less likely to transmit diseases from the area around their penis, but the men aren't left out of this benefit either. A 2005 study showed that circumcised men were at a lower risk of developing penile cancer.
- Women also stated that they were more satisfied sexually with a circumcised man. Not saying all women but there are women who prefer it.
https://y.yarn.co/c6ae5453-e0f6-405b-8367-16faf05005f1_text.gif
FF .
Con forfeited over 40% of debate.
bmp
vote
bump
Wow same acc? Or someone copying her? Wth 😂
Devon, look at Con’s formatting for Round 1.
Now compare it to PREZ-Hilton’s formatting in his two Tournament debates.:
1. https://www.debateart.com/debates/4333-w-o-f-tournament-laissez-faire-capitalism-is-more-efficient-than-social-democracy
2. https://www.debateart.com/debates/4391-%5Bwdt%5D-on-balance-the-german-invasion-of-poland-1939-was-justified
What do you notice?
🤔🤔🤔