Instigator / Pro
3
1500
rating
5
debates
30.0%
won
Topic
#4891

Directed Evolution v.s 6 Day Creationism

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

the_quiet_poet9
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1486
rating
10
debates
45.0%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Forfeited
Con
#2
Claim
The world was created through 6 day creationism

Arguments
I am unsure exactly what stance my opponent is taking in this because one of the tags is "Christianity". If they are for Christianity, then they must not believe in the Bible, because the Bible says explicitly how the world was made - in 6 days. But if they don't believe in the Bible, by what grounds do they believe in Christianity?
If they do not believe in Christianity, then presumably they are talking about a deistic god, one who is all-powerful but impersonal. 

Arguments for 6 day creationism:
1. It aligns with Christianity

2. One argument against 6 days is that there is scientific evidence that the earth took longer than that to come into being. However, there is no evidence at all for this as it is a theory. And the theory is saying, if the big bang is true, than this is true. But if the big band is not true, than it follows that this theory is not true.

Conclusion
This debate was either created from a religious standpoint, in which case it can be deduced that my opponent is deistic or something related to deism, or from a scientific standpoint, it which case it is their obligation to provide evidence for directed evolution.
Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
Extend
Round 3
Pro
#5
Forfeited
Con
#6
Extend and vote