Total debates: 49
The evidentialist model is used by Christians and Atheists alike to prove their respective beliefs, however - unlike Christians - Atheists are unjustified in their use of it. Both Christians and Atheist presuppose the existence of transcendentals, and I am arguing that belief in a God is necessary for justifying truth claims. Come debate me.
It is conventional wisdom that the "Lord," or "God" is not mentioned in the Constitution of the United States.
CON CLAIMS: No god is a god with omnipotence.
I believe that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.
**For Hero1000 Only** God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
DISCLAIMER: This is not a debate about Islam,Christianity and or Judaism. The debate particularly is focused on whether a Transcendent Reality,Higher Power and or First Cause Creator exists. Nothing more nothing less. Atheism or Theism/Deism.
No description has been provided
Christian god as described in the Bible cannot exist. By accepting this debate you also accept that the Bible is either the complete word of god or the Bible is completely made by mankind. There’s not saying that some scriptures are real and others are not. No picking and choosing. Primary burden of proof rests with Pro. Pro must prove that he is impossible and Con must prove that he is at least somewhat possible.
Engage in a spirited debate between Islam and Christianity as we delve into the logical coherence of the Trinity versus the monotheistic principle of Islam. Advocating for the Islamic perspective, we'll explore how the concept of a singular, indivisible God contrasts with the notion of a triune deity in Christianity. Join us as we challenge the logical foundations of the Trinity and affirm the belief in Allah as the one true and indivisible God.
Atheism is not the default position ultimately on the existence of God, but is a faith .
God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
A debate on whether the Bible teaches the doctrine of the Trinity. I will argue the Con position, asserting that the Bible does not support this concept.
No description has been provided
Let's open this up for anybody else available.
Christian god as described in the Bible cannot exist.
*God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
The premise of this debate is to discuss whether the Trinity (the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is mentioned in the Old Testament, whether together or separately. Are the three parts of the Godhead mentioned in the Old Testament.
No description has been provided
The probability of the existence of a God is higher than the probability of no God existing
Does the evidence suggest that Jesus Christ was a real individual or does it suggest that He is fictional
No description has been provided
Is it fair to conclude that since there is so much evil in the world and God does not stop it, God must not exist? I posit that the existence of evil further proves that there is a god. For in order for there to be evil there must be good and if there must be good, there must be a basis and creator of what is good.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
There is plenty of evidence in the world and in the universe that it has a creator, and an intelligent designer. This debate is not specifically regarding the Christian God, though I am a Christian so I will be leaning towards the Christian God, but right now, the topic is about whether or not a universe creator even exists in the first place.
Prove "Jesus is God" by using "I and the Father are one." John 10:30-38 (NIV), if it is possible to prove.
Is the belief in any God reasonable?
No description has been provided
Pro will argue that science and the existence of God are capable of being reconciled. Con will argue that either science or God disproves the other.
I will take the Con, meaning I do not think that God exists in the sense that it is an individual supernatural personality. The opponent will take the Pro, in that they think God does exist in the sense of an individual supernatural personality.
What is a very close definition of God? and is God real or not real or both or not both?
I will debate that religion and the concept of god is a net positive for the world, while my opponent will argue against.
This debate is about is Jesus Of Nazareth was truly a real person or not.
- intentionally left blank -
I am for Catholicism, con is for any protestant denomination.
Does a god exist? I believe there is good reasons for the existence of a god.
No description has been provided
Directed evolution is where God had a hand in controlling evolution, 6 Day is what Genesis says.
Pro is for creationism. Con for Big Bang.
A debate between whether or not creationism is logically sound and/or backed by evidence. Whether a belief in a God and that the universe was intentionally created rather than having risen through natural processes is a more justified belief. (Athiesm is the "con" beleive because theists / creationists are the ones making the claim that a God exists and that they know the origins of humanity and the universe. So joining this debate would require you to be in the "pro" (creationist) category)
I am arguing the pro-position that the Biblical God exists using arguments to those ends.
Personal interpretations of the bible will not be used in this debate, it will be a debate solely around what the bible says. This means that the Bible will be interpreted from a literal standpoint and not a metaphoric one.
Debate as to whether or not Christian God has or is defined by foreknowledge.
Personal interpretations of the bible will not be used in this debate, it will be a debate solely around what the bible says.