If you're a femboy you're a bitch.

Con was infinitely more respectful (as pro had zero respect out the gate).

both sides were based completely on opinion and had zero base in actual evidence (what do you expect? it's about femboys)

I'm giving this to con based on respect alone.

Lastly, I think I speak for all my fellow femboys when I say that no feelings were hurt, pro is just kinda... blunt. ;)

Seeing Best.Korea win a debate is simultaneously saddening and surprising. B.k. takes nothing seriously, so either this whole debate is a troll, or Pro is less logical than B.k.

Neither argument was good, but b.k. didn't use personal attacks, so win to b.k.

Pro asserted in Round 1 that he does not need to argue in favor of the proposition. Therefore, he did not make any arguments. However, in a debate, that's not really optional. Con countered that femboys are cute and listed several cute activities that can be done with femboys, such as petting on the head or cuddling, and argued that having relations with a femboy is not gay. Pro resorted to numerous personal attacks in response, calling Con "a homosexual weirdo" and "delusional". He also attacks femboys, calling them "an abomination" and remarking that they "smell like dookie and butt cheeks". Pro ends the debate with an appeal to "his master", a Youtuber whose teachings have "propelled [Pro] into the future", because "everything he says is fact". Considering Pro does not name his source, and considering he went the entire debate without uttering a single factual or objective statement, this appeal to authority is suspect. Con wins by default for offering something slightly closer to an argument, and for not resorting to personal attacks.