Instigator / Pro
8
1526
rating
66
debates
54.55%
won
Topic
#5319

There is no meaningful difference in what attracts heterosexual females, they all fundamentally want the same type of male

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
14
1309
rating
277
debates
40.61%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

This is a difficult burden for Pro, since Con only needs a single counterexample to disprove the topic. A lot of Pro's round is spent elaborating on their position rather than defending it. Con gives pedophiles as a counterexample, and even if I buy what Pro is telling me about parallels between "younger Chads" and "older Chads," they are too different to be the same group. As Con brings up, female pedophiles are not attracted to the tallest (or dominant, probably) of all males available, while other women are attracted to the tallest males available.

Even if Pro wants me to group "younger Chads" and "older Chads" together, they make their case difficult by making "tall" a criterion for a Chad (even if it's not the most important criterion.)

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

In short: "All of your arguments are unproven assumptions."

Pro builds a case of incel propaganda (at least it wasn't copy/pasted)

IF true,
THEN sources are easy to find.

Sources would have undermined con, making his kritik weightless.

Con on the other hand kritiks it with an alternative sexuality; and rather than pointing out that it's not really hetero, pro asserts that they go for those little boys because they're so Chad. Which con wisely uses to mock that said chads are "short and weak," which pro flounders at, and somehow doubles down on his off topic rape isn't rape claims.