Is the human population a problem for humanity?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 7 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Send a message for questions on the topic.
This could have been good debate with an interesting subject that is more simple than many think. I personally feel we are not over-populated, but very poor land managers because there is, all land types considered [arable/agriculteral, forest, meadow, arctic, desert and urban as main types] some 149M km^2 of total landmass, of which 37% [55.15M km^2 of arable/agricultural/pasture grazing land. The entire population of Earth, 8B could equally divide that 55M km^2 and occupy 0.006 km^2 of land, each [1.5 acres], leaving all other land types completely unpopulated but humans. That's entirely impractical, but points to the fact that we have not over-populated the Earth by humans.
Anyway, Con offered many points of argument, while Pro was a copmplete forfeit.
no argument, con is just asking questions.
Mike Tyson
FF by Con.
Mall actually participated.
Well, do I even need to explain?
Forfeiture
Not all human population is a problem.