1 Definitions
1. All omnipotence is unlimited power.
2. All power is the ability to do or undergo something.
Explanation. The above definition is a logical disjunction.
3. Every unrestricted thing is unlimited.
2 Axioms
1. If every god is a god that can be restricted, then no god is a god with omnipotence.
2. If every god is a god with unrestricted ability to do or undergo something, then
every god is a god with unrestricted ability to undergo limited power.
3. If every god is a god with unrestricted ability to undergo limited power, then every
god is a god that can be restricted.
3 Propositions
Proposition 1. IF EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE, THEN EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH UNRESTRICTED POWER.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then every god is a god with unlimited power [Def. 1]. If every god is a god with unlimited power, then every god is a god with unrestricted power [Def. 3].
Proposition 2. IF EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE, THEN EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH UNRESTRICTED ABILITY TO DO OR UNDERGO SOMETHING.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then every god is a god with unrestricted power [1]. If every god is a god with unrestricted power, then every god is a god with unrestricted ability to do or undergo something [Def. 2].
Proposition 3. IF EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE, THEN EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH UNRESTRICTED ABILITY TO UNDERGO LIMITED POWER.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then every god is a god with unrestricted ability to do or undergo something [2]. If every god is a god with unrestricted ability to do or undergo something, then every god is a god with unrestricted ability to undergo limited power [Axiom 2].
Proposition 4. IF EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE, THEN EVERY GOD IS A GOD THAT CAN BE RESTRICTED.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then every god is a god with unrestricted ability to undergo limited power [3]. If every god is a god with unrestricted ability to undergo limited power, then every god is a god that can be restricted [Axiom 3].
Proposition 5. IF EVERY GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE, THEN NO GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then every god is a god that can be restricted [4]. If every god is a god that can be restricted, then no god is a god with omnipotence [Axiom 1].
Proposition 6. NO GOD IS A GOD WITH OMNIPOTENCE.
Proof. If every god is a god with omnipotence, then no god is a god with omnipotence.
Remark. Either A or -A are correct. If A leads to -A, then -A must be via proof by contradiction unless -A also leads to A. Which it does not.
I agree with your characterization of qualifying maximal. If it comes up, I would rather it not be a subject of contention. People do conflate both terms.
When did I suggest that a god needs to act out every aspect of their omnipotence, if they do have it, at all times? I agree with your entire portrayal of how omnipotence does not work.
"omnipotence" needs no qualification of "maximally" or any other descriptive. The word, itself, by its Latin root, implies all [omni] power [potence]. You're merely creating verbosity.
And, saying that god [any] is "omnipotent" does not necessarily mean he/she acts omnipotently all the time. I suspect god acts with only the prudent power required to accomplish a given task. I suggest, for example, that it does not take omnipotence to plant seeds, whereas, organizing energy and matter from chaos to order just might. You, yourself, possess a certain power. Do you use all of it all the time? No? Then, why should god?
Professing my love for you Mall is anything but cowardice!
<3
Cowardice and trollish. Two sides of the same coin .
Love you <3
Cowardice.