white privilege exists

I’ll take a look at this.

Con's profile photo is cute. Its difficult to vote against that.

Can you take a look at Rizzler's vote and read con's second round where he makes no positive arguments and just calls me racist. He makes no effort to support his own position and the rizzler is essentially placing a type of revenge vote to avenge a position he holds.

I have premises for my arguments, you just didn't address them. I mentioned lower IQs for example and you just let my points stand.

sorry for the combined words i am in a rush.

Also Negroes is not a racist term. It feels wrong when a white person uses it but it's pretty neutral though is slowly riding the "euphemism wheel"

The 70s it wasn't racist, the 80s and 90s it was just too close to the word nigger so whites stopped saying it in case they were misheard, knowing that a lot of people just react emotionally to the word. Now because whites have decided not to say it, other whites not hearing it often have started to think the term was racist.

In this context, someone who votes their bias.

An example is on abortion debates there used to be Yes Men who jumped into the voting section to fluff whomever argued against abortion, regardless of all content in the debate…

That said, mild manipulation of bias without relying upon it, can be helpful. Sticking with the abortion example, either side in such a debate is usually better off sticking to known terminology… I’m pretty sure I deeply offended some people by identifying true pro-abortion politicians (pedophile “conservative” politicians trying to get teenage girls pregnant to up the number of abortions, so that they could then complain about it), which is a hill I’ll die on, but was also an inadvertent Red Herring against myself (for some precise abortion topics it would not be, but for most it’s missing the point).

You might be right. but whats a yes man?

Wyited switched accounts a long time ago, Most likely you typed W Y L, instead of W Y I when trying to tag him.

Anyways, you've got basically a day to post a response in the argument tab. You of course not limited to the ones I mentioned. You could even try to a racism Kritik (I don't advise this one, as it usually relies on the audience being Yes Men).

To save you a few headaches, try to imagine the possibility that Wyited is trolling with the intention of bringing attention to issues.

I didn't have the chance to respond. But Its obvious that your racist. You didn't even mention the topic at hand instead you go on talking about how whites are the supreme race. An if ur white why are you calling African Americans "Negroes".

Im talking about Wylted but i cant tag him so im taging you Barney

Hopefully you won't forfeit the remaining rounds...

Your basic paths to victory are:
1. The boring and expected approach, saying it's all explainable therefore "somehow" doesn't exist.
2. Absolute refutation, which is to say undermine each contention of pro's case.
3. Run a Semantics Kritik! The definition clearly states "an unfair advantage" but if you can show that it's perfectly fair by virtue of the divine bloodline of King Arthur (or whatever other white supremacist idol), then whites do not have an unfair advantage, thus not privlidge... Heck, you could take this a step further and show how disadvantages most white people are, being so very special in a way that only eugenics leaders like Trump recognize, and yet not all are born into the top 1% of wealth on the planet.

The last one is both joking, but would be a genuine tactic Wylted could pull off easily were the sides reversed.

So topic is just white vs black? Well, there is some space to argue there too. What counts as advantage? And do you mean all white people? Some whites are way below some black people, in wealth and everything. Also, black people do have some important advantages, like bigger dick on average and generally higher reproduction rate to replace white people. So yes, there is space to argue.

You can be more privileged than darkies and less then the big people and you would still be privileged but so would the bug people

"Meaning whites have an unfair advantage over non whites"

Are white people superior to asian people? Or does this topic just limits itself to white vs black?

You are not a trump tard so you would be arguing devils advocate.

I would accept, but I cant.

No conservative tards want to come here and claim white privilege doesn't exist