Money is more important then love

"It should be a tie , so i vote for con"
Removed which you already seem to support.

I support fauxlaw's opinion.

Yes, i voted in emotions wrongly.

Finally online

Eh?

I don’t understand why you said it’s should be a tie and then vote con.
If you think it should be a tie then vote tie. Not the opposing team for no reason.

Sorry, I did not see whiteflame's post just before mine. I was probably composing as he posted. But is that really correct? If neither participant enters a stoical argument, can that party still win the debate??

I do not understand these votes. Neither participant made an argument, unless there's consideration for "Let’s start my friend" as a topical argument. If ever a debate did not deserve a vote, this is it. A two-sided full forfeit, because if the argument entry is just fluff, might as well have been a forfeit. Should this one really be considered a debate worthy of a vote?

When a debater forfeits every single round, it means they didn’t show up at all. That means the other side, as long as they posted anything at all (even if it’s not an argument), automatically wins the debate by site rules. It’s also true that, with full forfeits like this, votes that award points to the side that did not forfeit are not subject to moderation. That side loses by default. Your vote would be the only one here subject to moderation since you awarded points to Con despite his forfeiting every round.

Jonrohith voted by emotions, not provided any reason.

Moozer325 doesn't give reason why he voted for pro, he only says con is forfeit.

TheRizzler voted just against me ,not given any reason

It is an incompleted debate, sorry i voted wrongly ,i should be vote for tie.

What then would you rather be without: money or love?