Instigator / Pro
7
1585
rating
22
debates
70.45%
won
Topic
#6163

TRILOGY ONLY In the Matrix, Agent Smith is closer to being the One than Neo is.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

AdaptableRatman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
16,800
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
1,501
Contender / Con
4
1561
rating
205
debates
54.63%
won
Description

Burden of Proof equal Con has to prove Neo was the One more than Agent Smith.

No wiki page that specifically defines the One as Neo is permitted. No source that belieces the Oracle told the full truth is permitted.

For Agent Smith to be closer to beinh the One it is required that the Oracle either lied or was proframmed fooled. Either way, the One was a concept and Zion was not the real world, it was another level of the Matrix.

In this debate, Con MUST prove the direct opposite to what Pro does; that Neo was closer to being the One than Agent Smith.

The One is supposed to be the person within the Matrix that frees humanity from the tyranny of the machines and even helps destroy the machines.

I am going to prove that firstly there was not just the One necessarily but that if there was it is far more Agent Smith than Neo. Neo may even be an implant from the true Machines, not the Zion level that feared Agent Smith more as well as worried about Neo.

You do not have to have seen the Matrix Trilogy to believe this. The fourth movie with the woman being the One is not really relevant to this. This is about Trilogy only. Only the first 3 movies are part of this debate.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither side makes this terribly easy for me, I'm afraid.

Pro's argument comes together well in the second round where I get a pretty discrete rundown of how his points gel to form a clear framework. I think Pro's first round was a little scattershot, more a collection of ideas and theories than a cohesive narrative that supported the resolution, but to his credit, Pro does manage to synthesize it pretty well. Mainly just a shame Pro doesn't manage to close out the debate as strong as he started it, with his last round largely dismissive of the points presented by Con rather than engaging with any of them specifically.

Con's argument largely coalesces in the third round, which is not too late to be considered, but does considerably weaken his points regarding how well the Christianity theming fits Neo into the box of "The One." It's also a kind of weird place to put that argument for the first time since Pro did put down some pre-rebuttal in his first round and spent much of his argument setting up a different religious lens through which to view the movies, which Con responded to by largely writing off the whole argument as Pro's headcanon. So Con didn't do himself any favors leading into that later argument.

The long and short of it is that I think Pro has the stronger argument if we're looking at which of them is set up as the most pivotal figure for fulfilling parts of the prophecy behind The One. Con argues several times that Neo fulfills that prophecy too, but Pro sets up a much more on balance comparison between the two, and while "catalyst" and "reactant" may not be the best terms to use to establish that (I know my chemistry well enough that I was scratching my head reading the parts of Pro's arguments that utilize those terms, and Pro doesn't do as good of a job as he could keeping them separate), Pro does clarify elsewhere that Agent Smith had a massive influence that Neo cannot match. I think he also sets up an interesting, albeit less direct, means of affirming the resolution through Gnosticism and Pantheism. From that lens at least, I can see where Pro is coming from pretty clearly, whereas the case Con later sets up for Christianity as a framework is more muddled and symbolic rather than directly evoking the philosophy underpinning that religion.

Where things get tricky is on the arguments about the sort of checklist for The One. Con lays out a pretty clear set of criteria that The Oracle says are required to be The One, including transcending the Matrix and Trinity falling in love with them, being in some sense born within The Matrix, and being identified by Morpheus. Those all bear weight in a distinct sense from whether or not certain names and metaphors hold up, and I think when the response to a lot of this is just "The Oracle's a liar", it just leads to more questions about what, then, are the discrete elements that define The One. Are those two elements lies from The Oracle? She clearly lied elsewhere, but it's unclear that she lied in these particular instances. Pro does manage to introduce some doubt as to whether Neo transcends the Matrix and both have claims to being "born" within it, so it mainly depends on how much weight I'm putting on Trinity falling in love with him and Morpheus's ability to identify him. I can't put much weight on the latter, mainly because Morpheus clearly does get it wrong on several occasions as both sides point out. So it really is mainly about the Trinity connection and, while I buy that that's a substantial point in Con's favor, I still end up voting Pro in the end. I think the weight of his broader thematic analysis and of Agent Smith's more weighty presence in the plot ends up doing more to support his position than Con can manage, and while I think Pro could have done a better job laying all this out in the final round, he does enough in the previous three to win my vote.