Rittz internally rhymes better than your chosen artist (SONGS BATTLE not debate)
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 1,800
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- None
I have listened to many rappers. I am convinced that if we focus specifically on Internal rhyming, Rittz is a unique freak at it. He does not robotically make it happen, he seems to know how to rotate multiple internal rhymes all at once interchanging them in out in etc while others he maintains over 4 lines. I have never ever seen an artist do the same as consistently and still be high quality at rap lyrics (what they mean) and sound.
2 songs per Round.
You vote on who rhymes internally better but you should also value delivery and flow. Rhyme spam that comes at the sake of delivery and flow is up to voters to weigh up.
Give ALL 7 to the winner.
NO debating unless one uses a fake/AI song or some weird rule breakage.
Song needs to be either Solo or maximum 2 rappers on the track.
Con must represent no more than 1 artist in all Rounds who is not Rittz.
Forfeiture would be enough to lose in a song battle, but compounding that I believe offering just links without any hint at what way they should be interpreted undermined con's case as well.
I admit not liking rap music, generally, but I can appreciate the style of writhing rap presents, and Rittz, Pro's chosen featured artist, excels at internal rhyme, particularly with use of a syncopated rhythm which one either has naturally, and Rittz does, or one fakes it, generally poorly. Of this I am qualified as a voter because I have published poetry since I was 14 in various literary mags in the 60s. - 90s
Pro's Description and R1 1st sentence had all the rules for this debate quantified; The first R1 line; "When you read Rittz lyrics they don't always read rhyming, you need to listen to where he emphasises in the songs to realize how he did it." I cited this because Pro's choice of artist, Rittz, as said, inherently gets it. All six songs Pro featured in 3 rounds exhibited the skill of internal rhyme and syncopation, Pro's voting protocol.
Con's R1 featured Slaughterhouse, a group of multiple rappers, violating pro's described single rapper requirement with 1 additional vocalist allowed.
Con's R2 feature Emenem, when the Description erequireed that the same artist be used for all three rounds. Even though Pro generously allowed the change, I go by his original description requirements, because rules require that once accepted, special rules by Description are locked and cannot change. AAlso, in RT2, Con presented not 2, but 3 songs, also breaking Description rules. Pro wins Argument points
Sourcing in this case is a matter of reviewing lytrivs of each song presented in debate. pro's choice of Rittz far exceeds the rhyme and beat of Con's featured artists. points to Peo.
Legibility, in this instance, is replaced by dedication to rhyme and beat of the songs. With superior internal rhyming by Pro's featured artist, Pro wins "Legibility."
Conduct: Con forfeited R3. With other rule violations by Con, Pro wins Conduct.
Should be an easy vote especially due to Round 3.
All 7 to winner please as per description, thank you in advance.
"Pro began with a Label that has multiple rap artists signed to it."
Meant Con.
You are using a group? LOL
Bump