Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6211

Calvinism is Biblical

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1522
rating
10
debates
60.0%
won
Description

This debate will evaluate whether the theological system known as Calvinism is biblically supported. Calvinism, often summarized by the acronym TULIP, includes five core doctrines: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. These doctrines affirm God's absolute sovereignty in salvation, man's inability to choose God apart from grace, and the effectual nature of Christ's atoning work for the elect.

The Pro side will argue that Calvinism faithfully represents the teachings of Scripture concerning human nature, divine sovereignty, salvation, and grace. The Con side will argue that Calvinism either misrepresents or goes beyond what the Bible teaches, and that alternative interpretations (e.g., Arminianism, Molinism, or other soteriologies) align more closely with Scripture.

Definitions:

Calvinism: The Reformed theological system centered on God’s sovereign election and the doctrines of grace, particularly as articulated in the five points of Calvinism.

Biblical: Derived from or supported by the proper interpretation of the Bible.

Burden of Proof:
The burden is shared. Pro must demonstrate that the key doctrines of Calvinism are clearly taught in Scripture. Con must demonstrate that these doctrines are either not supported by Scripture or are contradicted by it.

Debate Structure (suggested):

Round 1: Opening arguments (no rebuttals).

Round 2: Rebuttals and defense.

Round 3: Further rebuttals and analysis.

Round 4: Final rebuttals and closing arguments (no new arguments).

Rules:

Arguments must be grounded in Scripture. Appeals to church history, logic, or tradition are welcome but should not replace biblical support.

No forfeits. No trolling or semantics.

Citations of Scripture should include chapter and verse for verification.

This is a theological debate with eternal significance. Both sides are encouraged to engage respectfully, thoughtfully, and with a sincere commitment to truth.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro forfeited

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

I don't actually think Con argued their case all that well. Nonetheless, they still win by default due to forfeiture.