Instigator / Pro
1
1382
rating
441
debates
45.69%
won
Topic
#6271
Abortion and homosexuality are two sides of the same coin.
Status
Voting
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
2
1500
rating
6
debates
41.67%
won
Description
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Questions on the topic, send a message.
Round 1
I thought this would attract so and so.
The opposing side says that the opposing side supports homosexuality but not abortion.
The truth is according to the topic forum, is that the abortion is supported by the opposing side.
All stages of pregnancy are all stages of pregnancy and the first stage is prior to a baby developing and being developed.
So to get it on record, the question to the opposing side, do you support abortion prior to the development of a complete human being inside the woman, the womb of man?
Audience, if the opposing side does not answer these questions honestly and direct, it will be a forfeit on the topic.
The termination of a pregnancy which is the end of an unborn life which comes down to cellular level, cell, germ, strand of DNA, particle, atom, etc.
All these elements including sexual reproductive elements are not a concern for true "pro choice/pro abortion" folks.
So it would make sense to use the same basis for homosexuality.
The act of homosexuality disregards sexual reproductive sexuality.
So it be inconsistent to support one and not the other. Someone that is against aborting or killing a developed baby is not because that one is opposed to terminating life but because what is being terminated resembles so much of an alike species, there is perhaps emotional appeal, empathetic appeal.
But this is a tug at the conscience as opposed to integrity of keeping life period. It's like a person that can't stand to see animals butchered for meat but is a meat eater. The person will not be vegan for the sake of integral principle of keeping animal life.
Likewise with people that are pregnant by an incomplete conception period and take a pill or some sort of procedure to end life growing, the life is still being stripped away of what could of been further which was to be a baby.
So it's the mere image viscerally by empathic relationship that a pro abortion person cannot stomach. That is , no pun intended, the aborting of an unborn baby but would accept aborting unborn life. Which has inconsistency of its own.
If you are that person that supports homosexual use of sexual organs to abort their function in use, but is for abortion prior to the development of a baby, you are demonstrating the two sides of the same coin.
Which proves the topic statement. If you are for abortion up until some point and support homosexuality, it solidifies the topic statement and negates your stance at once.
Why the negation?
This is by being for taking away the life of that baby in advance instead of post development.
You shoot a gun , fire a shot off, throw a blunt object up in the air , you don't see where it strikes. Therefore it won't have the same effect on you if you were to see whom it strikes.
However the integrity of doing such things is still the same devasting destructive harmful deleterious reality which solidifies and argues to the persuasion of one's consistency.
So I end here with the question to the opposing side. Forfeiting to answer is forfeiting the debate.
Do you support abortion prior to the development of a complete human being inside the woman, the womb of man?
No, I dont support abortion, but homosexuality is okay.
Round 2
They're unable to ban you completely.
Their weakness then.
Round 3
Why did the great sun god get banned?
What did you do then?
Why did the great sun god get banned?
Adaptable became moderator and I was so upset that I asked some other moderator to ban me.
Round 4
Such a circus on this site.
Interesting interacting with you again.
Thank you for this talk.
Are you kidding? I literally see no argument from you in this one. If you are talking about the other debate in which i voted for your opponent then yes, i totally understand what argument you wanted to make there. You just made it look like a kid that starts to explain a law of physics that he saw on youtube and only gets the name right and not the explanation. I highly doubt you actually understood what you wanted to say, considering how incoherent your arguments are... .
You dont seem to understand my arguments.
Does anybody believe in supporting homosexuality but not abortion and vice versa?
To participants, readers and voters: please read my eighth line which currently says: "...by arguing that abortion and homosexuality are not linked by any common thread..." by deleting "not." That is not wha was meant. Therefore, read as "by arguing that abortion and homosexuality are linked by any common thread..." Thanks.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: pierree // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 to Pro
>Reason for Decision:
LucyStarfire get the fuck out of this site please
>Reason for Mod Action:
Pretty obvious...
**************************************************