Abortion and homosexuality are two sides of the same coin.
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Questions on the topic, send a message.
Lucystarfire as always doesn't even try to make an argument. But pro just proposes an incredibly absurd topic that it isn't even possible to defend by argument. Anyways, another missed win from lucystarfire.
Pro’s R1 asks a question that belongs in the Description because it asks for a different BoP than stipulated by the Resolve: “Abortion and homosexuality are two sides of the same coin.” By the Resolve, Con’s BoP is that Abortion and Homosexuality are not two sides of the same coin, but demands “do you support abortion prior to the development of a complete human being inside the woman, the womb of man?” which is not directed to the Resolve as a blanket acceptance of Abortion, but parsing it by time. And there is no mention of homosexuality in the question, but demands a forfeit should the question be ignored., which amounted to a quasi-early round blitzkrieg. That's not necessarily a detraction from Pro, but not an above-board argument: “The act of homosexuality disregards sexual reproductive sexuality.” This is patently false because at least one of the sexual partners can be a fertile female who declares being homosexual, but can have relations with the opposing sex, and become pregnant by those relations, regardless of whether the other partner in her sexual life is male or female. Therefore, the statement fails.
Con replied to the Pro R1 Question in R1, “No, I don't support abortion, but homosexuality is okay,” which de-links the “two sides of the coin” resolution, thus defeating the Resolve unless Pro can rebut in a succeeding round by arguing that abortion and homosexuality are not linked by any common thread, let alone by the rigidity of coinage.
Pro’s R2 appears as an extension, but is completely unresponsive to the Resolve, discussing Con’s potential ban. What has that to do with th4e debate?
Con’s R2 response amounts to an extension of argument, but recognized that the Resolve is incorrect, and therefore a relevant rebuttal more than merely an extension because of Con's de-linking rebuttal.
Pro’s R3 & R4 are, like R2, unrelated to the Resolve, and any argument supporting it.
Con, having successfully turned the Resolve to his favor, wins.
Are you kidding? I literally see no argument from you in this one. If you are talking about the other debate in which i voted for your opponent then yes, i totally understand what argument you wanted to make there. You just made it look like a kid that starts to explain a law of physics that he saw on youtube and only gets the name right and not the explanation. I highly doubt you actually understood what you wanted to say, considering how incoherent your arguments are... .
You dont seem to understand my arguments.
Does anybody believe in supporting homosexuality but not abortion and vice versa?
To participants, readers and voters: please read my eighth line which currently says: "...by arguing that abortion and homosexuality are not linked by any common thread..." by deleting "not." That is not wha was meant. Therefore, read as "by arguing that abortion and homosexuality are linked by any common thread..." Thanks.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: pierree // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 to Pro
>Reason for Decision:
LucyStarfire get the fuck out of this site please
>Reason for Mod Action:
Pretty obvious...
**************************************************