Air transport is not safer still now.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
I am very sad about accident of air India plane killed 200 + lives, I am feeling still air transport is not safer.
Title?
Air transport is 'still not safer now?
Hm,
Comments #6 "not safer than any other common transports road, sea, track."
Pro
Pros claims are highly suspect without sources,
And many of their claims run counter to what seems to me common sense.
Climate for example, can play a large role in car crashes and being stranded, ice, snow.
Con
What's the 1 in Xillion chance of dying in a car crash?
I get that more people have died in cars and trains, but I'd figure more people use cars and trains?
RFV
Con didn't directly counter Pro's arguments, though arguably they were largely addressed by Cons argument that statistically less people have died from flying in recent years.
Con did have 'a source.
Both sides seem to have forfeited a bit.
Legibility hurt Pro a bit I think, though they clarified the title in the comments.
I also think their grammar could improve a bit, though I can only speak 'one language myself, and even in English, my grammar isn't great.
Opinion
I think Con is right, and that planes are currently generally safer.
Perhaps because of how regulated and monitored they are by companies, rather than individuals.
I would change sentences such as
"In this world neither transport is not 100% safe like cars , trains. But I want to say Air transport is not safer for many reasons."
to
In this world neither cars nor trains are 100%. But I want to say Air transport has many reasons it is less safe.
And again, I've poor grammar, but I think Pro's grammar still harms their arguments some.
sorry, due to some issues I delayed argument.
This would be a spicy debate
not safer than any other common transports road, sea, track.
actually i will accept this debate
OMG i wish i could accept this but it would be so much on my plate!!!!!
it is such an interesting debate
A contraption weighing 320tons, with 60000 litres of fuel and 340 people on board is inherently unsafe, and a tragedy waiting to happen.
Every time you fly, you take a risk.
I would likely start that debate, but as below, safer than when?
safer than what?