My profile photo is better than your profile photo
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Voters will vote which profile photo they like most. You can even try to convince them that yours is better.
Brief exchange between father and son. No debate between both sides.
It seems, pro initiated the debate, so burden automatically goes to con to prove him wrong. By presenting resolution, it means at least a single argument was made and con did not refute him. It would have been enough if he say we both have same. Then it would have been tie
Since she had it first she should win
Butttttt no agreement too be had
Very random
Wholesome moment between father and son!
Their profile pictures are the same, so even. Con wins by default.
Con could have argued that Pro's profile picture wasn't "better" and that the resolution was negated, but they never argued along those lines. Since both pictures are identical and the description says to vote for the profile pic you like most, I'm leaving this a tie since I can't like a picture more than itself.
My profile pic is better than both participants because:
1. I created it; it is not someone else's work.
2. It has been my profile image for 5 years, so it has sustained presence on this site.
3. It is symbolic.
4. It can be relied upon to represent the greatest vocal variety of any genus on Earth, including man, making it the best debate participant, ever [but that's not me; I'm, just the frontman for the frog]
I knew this strategy would work so it didnt suprise me or make me laugh.
LucyStarfire tamed Con somehow out of autowin.
Neither side made an argument.
I have to give Con credit for being the better troll here. Genuinely made me laugh out loud.
It's not a shared bop. It's all on pro but even if the bop is not on pro than it worst it is evenly split. Literally ask any seasoned debater.
Do you know how BOP works?
When, a guy accepts a challenge, then burden is shared. One is channeling and other is accepting it. I have given a logic for my point. There is an argument and you said nothing about it. Why care for a troll debate though. But what I said has something big behind it and is applicable on all kinds of debate. Resolution itself is big argument. And both parties either support it or refute it. I did not see any refutal at all. And you will not find a vote which goes against my believe. It's impossible. And I never give biased vote. If is see a Muslim is loosing I just do not vote. And there sre many debates some Muslim asked me to vote but i did not. When is see there is chance a Muslim is winning then I do vote. Or mostly vote for topics which are not related to our believes and mostly FF.
you can see it's just balancing the vote. And I gave something for it.
Any ways I am more of preacher then debater. I feel good for everyone whether Christian or atheist. May Allah guide us all ameen
If you are for it as it is junk in the server space, you must be for this too.
Idk why you are angry, snarky or any of it about this.
When debate is moderated, voters do have obligation to not only read, but write a vote which includes plenty of stuff and goalposts from debate, or otherwise their vote gets removed. If debates werent moderated, less effort would be required, thus more votes.
I think there are very few active users and most of them are not willing to read long debates.
Moderators cannot force votes. This website needs marketing to start gaining some users.
I had serious debates and basically had to beg for days to get just 1 vote, but I do something like this and get 10 votes without ever even asking. Maybe because votes here are not moderated.
Funny that this is the hottest debate in the platform without even being a debate.
Bro, BOP is always on the one making a claim. Why can't Muslims be as good as Christians and just be unbiased. Like Christians if they see an atheist win an argument will vote for an atheist but you guys just have to disobey Allah by being liars. And biased. Sad
Congratulations on finding a clause which mentions forfeiture. You’re still leagues away from identifying any which say I should delete any debate which fails to meet my quality standards.
As someone who keeps complaining that I’m infinitely corrupt, this is frankly bizarre that you’re also complaining that I’m so very corrupt as to refuse to abuse my moderation powers.
"Should either side forfeit every round or every round after their initial arguments (waiving is not an argument), the debate is considered a Full Forfeiture, and any majority votes against the absent side are not moderated (a vote may still be cast in their favor of the absentee, but is eligible for moderation to verify that it is justified via the normal voting standards)."
Your imagination is a wonderful thing, but when it disagrees with easily verified facts like this, it may be prudent accept the facts (or even suggest future refinements).
The main CoC doesn’t mention the word forfeiture, and the part of the voting policy you are trying—and failing—to quote specifically says:
“A forfeiture occurs when either side in a debate is a true no show for a round, allowing the timer to expire. It is not to be confused with merely waiving a round, or having an abysmally poor argument (see Foregone Conclusions below)”
The FF clause says if no arguments are made or if none are made after the first Round arguments are made in (even if that Round is Round 2 of more) that is FF.
Checkmate.
You’ve insisted the CoC has a clause which supports your argument, please quote said clause.
When Lucy or Wylted changes their profile photo, half the votes are gonna make no sense lol.
You used the word 'forfeit'.
Making 0 arguments is forfeiting.
You're welcome to look it up and tell me how wrong I am:
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/rules
What is a forfeit defined as in the CoC
Again, given that neither side forfeited, that question is Non-Sequitur.
Show me 1 word from either side that is a debate here
LOL
> If you delete this vote,
This is a non-moderated debate, thus (baring extreme cases) votes shall not be regulated. Plus you voted a tie, those are likewise not regulated.
> If you delete full FFs why don't you delete this too?
Given that neither side forfeited, that question is Non-Sequitur.
Okay, I post my drawings after debate done.
Go out and live on the edge! What's somebody gong to do? Delete your drawing? Screw 'em.
I just draw in samsung notes. I am not great at drawing, just basic runes and signs.
I voter for your drawing
I cant post my actual photo because people would use it against me. So its either AI either someone else's photo or some drawing I make 😣
I'm, just glad the thumb isn't jammed up the nose
If you delete this vote, you'll delete the most rational response to this debate, and it fulfills the close of the Description.
Besides, I'm confused by fathers and sons who look like twins
If you delete full FFs why don't you delete this too?
Thats my president <3
Bro I thought someone was hacking
LMAO.
That is just too funny