Instigator / Pro
0
1589
rating
219
debates
54.34%
won
Topic
#6349
Diet Battle
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After not so many votes...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- None
Contender / Con
0
1421
rating
30
debates
38.33%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
Breakfast
A liter of iced coffee (4 shots of cream, 8 tablespoons of sugar, and triple shots of hazelnut)
A liter of iced coffee (4 shots of cream, 8 tablespoons of sugar, and triple shots of hazelnut)
Bacon, eggs toast. Greasy spoon style
Donut and bagel with cream cheese
Smoking a cigarette as an appetizer and smoking a cigarette for dessert.
Lunch
A street hot-dog, slice of pizza, and a slice of deli pastrami sandwich.
Bag of chips, and a bag of pretzels.
Red bull
Dinner
Meatloaf and mashed potatoes, and a budweiser
Dessert
A carton of strawberry Haagen-Dasz!
DIET: Eating Like 5 Guys, presented by DoorDash
1 PM: "Pre-Workout" (Walking around your house, fatass) Protein Breakfast
-Bacon Cheeseburger (1060 Calories)
-Bacon Dog (600 Calories)
-Reese's Cups Milkshake Mix-In (150 Calories, plus the average calories of a milkshake, which 390-870 calories) Peanut Butter is healthy, isn't it?
3 PM: Early Snack
-Grilled Cheese (470 Calories)
-Veggie Sandwich (265 Calories)
-Coffee Milkshake Mix-In, since you're already starting to feel tired carrying yourself around (29 calories, plus the average calories of a milkshake)
6PM: Lunch
Appetizer: Large Fries (1310 Calories), plus a bunch of those peanuts they serve)
Meal:
-BLT Sandwich (600 Calories)
-2x Little Cheeseburgers (610 Calories each)
-Small cajun style fries (530 calories, likely a bit more since they have added ingredients)
-1 large Coca-cola, no ice for maximum soda capacity
- A second large coca-cola, also no ice, purchased with doordash rewards
7PM: Midday Snack
- Small fries with a side of jalapeno peppers (535 calories)
9:30PM: Dinner
Appetizer: More of those peanuts, a side of grilled onions and grilled mushrooms
Meal:
-2x Bacon Cheese Dogs w/ relish and ketchup (715 Calories each)
-Hamburger (840 Calories- only 840 instead of the other burgers... gotta watch those calories!)
-Small fries (530 calories)
-Large Sprite, one again no ice
Dessert:
- Oreo Cookie Milkshake mix-in (65 calories plus the average milkshake calories)
9:45PM: Late night snack
-Strawberry Milkshake (you know the drill)
-Little Bacon Burger (620 Calories)
Supplemented by gaming and discord roleplaying all day, until 5AM
Round 2
Con's total calorie intake comes to.: 11 814 kcal and 13 734 kcal.
Sumo wrestlers consume anywhere near 7000 to 10,000 calories a day. Con expects us to believe he has surpassed that.
The largest athletes that aren't sumo and morbidly obese people can't even consume anywhere near that amount. It takes rarities to be the exception, or specialized training to get to that level.
Con's body wouldn't allow him to get anywhere close to that level and if he pushed past his limits, would likely be hospitalized.
The statistics and the physics make this both unlikely and unrealistic, meaning that Con is most likely exaggerating or fabricating these results.
Breakfast
3 belgium waffles - maple syrup - strawberry, five scrambled eggs, three bacon, and two slices of toast.
Large glass of OJ
Lunch
Fried bologna sandwich with lettuce + tomato, and french fries.
Coke + Milk shake.
Dinner
Spaghetti bolognese
There is nothing in the description that the diet has to be the arguer’s diet- therefore the criticism is invalid.
This can be further proven with the fact that my opponent claims he had a cig for breakfast and dinner… which is suspiciously absent from his Round 2, the same round where he argues a nonexistent rule. It is unlikely just a man who smokes multiple times a day just takes a day off, therefore that was likely an exaggeration as well.
Anyway, here’s the next diet:
Nothing. Eating nothing.
Round 3
There is nothing in the description that the diet has to be the arguer’s diet- therefore the criticism is invalid.
Extend short description.: "Whoever has the unhealthier and more delicious diet wins."
Breakfast:
Cinnamon rolls, french toast, and hot chocolate.
Lunch
BLT's with coke.
Dinner
Ribs, steak, and potato salad. (With more coke.)
It is unlikely just a man who smokes multiple times a day just takes a day off, therefore that was likely an exaggeration as well.
With the exception that you're a very moderate or social smoker that lit up two cigarettes at separate times.
Anyway, here’s the next diet:Nothing. Eating nothing.
No diet.
Rebuttals
Extend short description.: "Whoever has the unhealthier and more delicious diet wins."
Has as in actively eating what’s in the diet, or has as in something that’s proposed? For example, a Ford bigwig could say to his engineers: “Draw up some blueprints. Whoever has the best car is what we’re going with.”
Because of this, the rule is not an explicit ban on my R1 argument.
With the exception that you're a very moderate or social smoker that lit up two cigarettes at separate times.
Breakfast isn’t very social… and it’s pretty clear that “for breakfast and for dinner” was a joke. Especially when someone so intent on smoking, just doesn’t smoke the next two days. That rarely happens and such, I doubt it the same.
But sure, it’s technically feasible that you smoked twice one day and didn’t the next.
So is the caloric intake HALF that of a competitive eater:
Due to an unclear rule that doesn’t ban what Pro claims (as well as a likely violation of the rules by my opponent), it is thus that I ask the voters to adopt the standard of what is feasible, not what the arguer has done.
No diet.
Eating nothing is a diet. It’s counts as a diet of nothing.
dietnounUS /ˈdaɪ.ət/ UK /ˈdaɪ.ət/Add to word listB1 [ C or U ]1. the food and drink usually eaten or drunk by a person or group:2. an eating plan in which someone eats less food, or only particular types of food, because they want to become thinner or for medical reasons:
If you plan to eat nothing (definition 2) to become thinner, it is technically a diet. And if you consume nothing, your diet for that day is nothing (definition 1).
My last diet
Breakfast
Cinnamon Toast Crunch w milk, and a pack of lucky charms marshmallows
Lunch
1 medium stuffed crust pepperoni and sausage pizza from Pizza Hut. 2 20 oz bottles of Pepsi
Snack
Half a container of oreos, and 2 small bags of potato chips
Dinner
Cheeseburger, buffalo wings, and onion rings at your local bar. A Hurricane- 3 in fact. You’re getting shitfaced tonight!
Midnight snack
Half of a coconut cream pie
Summary
Rd 1: I argue that my Rd1 is unhealthier than my opponent’s, while being more delicious because five guys is awesome.
Rd2: Eating nothing consistently can cause serious health problems
This it is far more unhealthy than my opponent’s. However, I will cede that nothing is not very delicious.
Rd3: My opponent has a lot of health-ish foods in his selection. I have none. In addition, my portions are slightly larger.
In addition, I have more delicious items than my opponent’s in this round, with some highlights being:
-Stuffed crust pizza
-Lucky charms marshmallows
-buffalo wings
-hurricane
-coconut cream pie
-Oreos
Conclusion
I believe I have claimed rounds 1 and 3, with 2 being a draw.
As a whole, my diets are unhealthier and mostly, more delicious. Not just when judging round by round, but the debate as a whole.
Vote Con!
ping
the rules don't say anything about you having said diet
Yeah, you can accept. FishChaser’s just scared because he can’t clog his arteries like I can.
Since Fishchaser hasn’t accepted, mind if I take this one?
Why not just send him a challenge? Anyway, tagging him