Instigator / Pro
1
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6430

Atheism is bizzare

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Sources are the spine of an argument, especially in tis instance. Without them, the argument has no legs to stand on.
That said, pro backs practically all his arguments with idolatry, making his argument fragile and nonsensical.
Despite pro's failure to use proper sources, con actually provides decent rhetoric to oppose pro's fairytale fantasies.

I'm not an atheist, but the verdict? I'm sorry pal, Muhammad can't save you on this one.....

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

The fact that there aren't multiple parameters makes me mad but ok, the Con's attestations just bases it on the 'fairy tale' of religious books and also it's basically sourceless, even when talking about the Big Bang Theory, what happened before that is not our business and I think we shouldn't even ask ourselves about this, it's purely metaphysical stuff that distracts us from the real argument.

Pro on the other hand provided only Qur'an based arguments which I think is pretty good also as informations because he didn't use them as an excuse to justify misinterpretations of the Qur'an itself, the exact opposite of what has been done by Con just the prove his point.

You both provided really good argument which I think they incorporate good concepts for you both, but as an overall I think Pro had the best.