Instigator / Pro
7
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6661

Origin of life

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

The idea that life came from chemicals is a desperate attempt to provide an answer to the origin of life. It is a complete impossibility and is a belief, not science.
Show me that I am wrong.

Round 1
Pro
#1
I got a notification that I need to address an argument regarding my topic on the origin of life.  I do not see the argument, instead I got this:  “To have a higher chance of winning, it is crucial to not only provide more convincing arguments but also to specify the information sources, demonstrate a respectful attitude toward the opponent, and write the text with a minimum amount of grammatical mistakes.”

Jessie, did you post a counter point to my topic?
Con
#2
Forfeited