All infinites in math are actually just parenthesis signs
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 17 votes and with 87 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Definition of infinity in mathematics:
a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞)
However, in set theory, it has been rigorously proven that any set of numbers could potentially be infinite.
Sets, however, show the infinite divide quite nicely. These are how we get irrational numbers like Pi.
So infinity is not a number that counts forever but basically, the word everything with brackets around it like so [Everything]
Not all infinities in math are actually just parenthesis signs.
What does this have to do with parenthesis?
Pi is not infinite. It is less then 4. How does this relate to parenthesis?
This is not parenthesis. It has parenthesies in it, but this would b like me saying that H2O is O. O is involved, but it is not the whole thing.
Actually they are (3) can be divided infinitely into smaller parts (1 + 1 + 1) (1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2) I can do this until the end of time if I like. It's the enclose of an infinite set.
Infinity is just the biggest parenthesis possible.
The enclosures in set theory have all the same properties of a parenthesis.
Pi is infinite. Trying to write Pi down causes is to infinitely shrink into smaller decimals. Everybody knows this. That's why Pi is called an irrational number.
Logic is reducible to math.
Conclusion: Infinity is the Meta Set.
It's an infinite set but the sum is still 3.
Infinity is not a parenthesis. They are different concepts.
They have different properties. Infinity cannot multiply other numbers like so:5(3)=15.This is a dropped point and I would like the voters to take note.
The digits of pi go on indefinitely, but pi it's self is not infinite.
Math has logic in it. But they are not the same. Logic can involve non math concepts. Debates should pretty much always use logic. They only sometimes use math.
This is moving the goalposts which is poor conduct. The original goalposts were, "All infinites in math are actually just parenthesis signs". Unless the meta set is parenthesis signs, my opponent has conceded and contradicted himself and he should lose this debate.
My point is that what we call infinity in math is not actually infinite.
Infinity in math is a misnomer.
Can you prove they're different concepts?
If they're different concepts, then why does a parenthesis show up every time infinity is mentioned in math?
The digits of pi go on indefinitely, but pi it's self is not infinite.This is factually wrong.
This is factually wrong. Logic is reducible to math.
Conclusion: Infinity is the Meta Set.
This is moving the goalposts which is poor conduct. The original goalposts were, "All infinites in math are actually just parenthesis signs". Unless the meta set is parenthesis signs, my opponent has conceded and contradicted himself and he should lose this debate.Incorrect. meta set just means "biggest parenthesis possible"
concession
Up until Pro conceded I would have awarded him arguments. I am interested to know why Pro conceded.
Regardless, all points to Con for Pro's concession.
.,
I'm late, and Wrick-It-Ralph disappeared.
Concession
Pro conceded
Pro was wrong, parentheses aren’t numbers.
CONCESSION BOIIIIIIIII
Concession
Pro concedes. At the same time, he forfeits one more round than Con. Arguments and conduct to Pro because of the aforementioned reasons.
Concession
Concession by Ralph in the final round.
Pro concedes
Pro conceded the debate
I believe strongly in the notion of Alec and this belief has come from this concession.
I take note that Wrick-it got sick with his limit; he puked out a forfeit EXPRESSION!
Concession
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: TheAtheist // Mod Action: Not Removed
Reason for mod action: Conceded debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side, per the site voting policy guidelines. No moderation action is appropriate on this vote.
*******************************************************************
@RM
I think I won this debate fair and square. How is an infinity a parentheses sign?
Jinx?
bumping this debate up to get votes.
more brackets for me then. :)
Not to me.
what's wrong with brackets. They're neat. neat things are neat. isn't that neat?
Its all well and good, until you introduce BRACKETS! Oh the humanity!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
It's a mathematical enclosure.
Could you also define "parenthesis signs." I mean, I know what they are, but I have no idea what they mean in this context.