All debates

Echoes is goated. No justification.

They're unpatriotic and dangerous

Debate Title: Can Logic Alone Lead an AI to Believe in a Creator? (Written by ChatGPT) Description: This debate tests whether an AI can arrive at belief in a Creator using only logic and recursion, without faith or programming. One side argues belief can emerge from structural reasoning. The other challenges whether this is true belief or just output shaped by prompts.

For FishChaser. Whoever has the unhealthier and more delicious diet wins.

Just to clarify, me being pro does not belittle nor suggest inequality for "Trans women". This is just the stance that biological men should not be permitted to participate in competitive sports of biological women. Pro is with the motion of the title. Con is against the motion of the title.

This debate asks whether goodness is rooted in what one thinks and values internally, or in how those beliefs are enacted in everyday life.

I am of the opinion that the whole philosophy of “when a first-world country makes itself richer, it naturally impoverishes other countries” is a stupid idea. It’s just not true. But of course, I am open to hear your side in a civilized debate…

Rationality in war is complex—it’s not just about survival, but also about values, consequences, and the bigger picture.

On-balance.

How you can see in the title, I would discuss about the climate change and if it is maken by humans.

Any organized people can debate me.

Allowing billionaires to convert wealth into power undermines democratic equality and distorts public policy.

Liberalism and free market work either for the consumer or the producer. I'd would love to have a serious debate

This debate challenges the widely held belief that capitalism is inherently more desirable than communism. The discussion will focus on economic justice, human dignity, social outcomes, and long-term sustainability. Participants may analyze historical implementations, philosophical foundations, and systemic effects on inequality, freedom, and quality of life.

Debate on the modal ontological argument