-->
@Moozer325
What interests me about the whole Martry situation is that so many people assumed he didn’t use it. Not that it wasn’t an okay assumption, but it seemed so clear from the info we had that he has used it.Multiple people echoed that WyIted was a weird NK and when a Martry dies DP1, it seems more likely that they used their ability than were killed, right? Scum would obviously know that WyIted was NKed, so it’s a possibility that one of the people who assumed he was NKed right out of the gate scum slipped a little.This line from banana fits that bill a little:If he used his martyr then wouldn't there be no night kill?But I could also see that being s genuine question. Maybe there’s some reason that so many people went this way that I’m missing. If so, I’d like to hear it.
I agree that if someone came off as pretty certain that WyIted was NK'd, that would come off as a concerning, particularly if they didn't use a night action (since they'd have no way to know that his role hadn't been used). If they did have a night action and assumed that their success implied that WyIted didn't use his role, that makes more sense to me.
That being said, I don't think anyone falls into this camp. Mharman assumed the NK, but then said he might have sacrificed himself. Cerulean talked about how he might have had incentive to use his role. And you assumed early that he had used his role. Like I said earlier, I don't like that being Banana's first response to the flip since she wouldn't have received any indication that her role had failed, so she should already have had some insight into whether his role was used. That being said, it was just one post and could be genuine, as you say.