Everyone read only the 1st comment here. The 1st is from some woman that claims women's intuition is never wrong.
A lot of stupid people will instinctively blindly accept that this is true with no thought behind it (and the reason is because the word, "woman" gives some level of serotonin in who reads that word in the moment and this is enough to make the stupid majority of this nation agree to it). A woman here thinks that a woman's intuition is never wrong. Imagine if a man says, "A man's intuition is never wrong". We'd think he's some cocky SOB. This woman here is also a cocky SOB.
Why do I call this statement stupid? Read the 2nd comment.
You reference the word, "woman" in a way that makes sense, you could say, "A woman should have the right to end the life of her 4 year old child if she feels it's the correct thing to do and she feels that she can't take of them" (not trying to make this about abortion). Replace "woman" with "man" and other required changes, and this sounds barbaric.
On the flip side, a woman can say, "A woman should have the right to become a pilot" and society reacts exactly the same way as the statement involving 4 year old homicide. If a man says, "A man should have the right to become a pilot", then society is like, "Facts".
A man's words matter; a woman's words right now DON'T.
Now, I am of the opinion that you should be treated like your words and opinions matter if we give you the right to vote.
So women should have to endure 2 options:
- Lose the right to vote. They can become like children that you can legally fuck and they get the privilege of their words not mattering (at the expense of their right to vote).
- Be given equal rights (and responsibilities) to a man. This means they both can vote, but this means if a woman says something, then treat it exactly the same way as if a man said it (so claim, "Facts" if the statement is undeniably accurate, claim, "Hmmm" if the statement might be accurate, and claim, "Bullshit" if the statement is inaccurate) and we should never produce serotonin for when you talk; you can have serotonin and no voting rights like a child or a trichotomy of options and voting rights like adult men right now get.
I think this standard should apply to everyone of all ages. So if you're 5 years old and want the right to vote, then you will get the right to vote (while at the same time, you will be judged by everything that you say because it matters now). If a 5 year old comes out in favor of free homes for all and they have voting rights, then treat them exactly the same way as if a 25 year old with voting rights said it. People should be expected to argue with that person on the streets.
Voting rights are for those with enough of a thick skin to accept the idea that they might be wrong regardless of age or gender and change their beliefs accordingly. Anyone with voting rights should have a lanyard around their neck indicating that they wish for their statements to be judged like a voter.
