-->
@Tradesecret
Longer post, took me a while to get to it.
I think attempting to say whether God condoned or didn't condone salvery is a very simplistic question on a very complex idea.It's well and good to say that God could have simply put into the Bible - "don't own slaves." He didn't, therefore, he condones slavery. I think that is a very weak argument.
I'm arguing he condoned slavery because he says so in Lev 25:44-46, as per the OP.
The number one problem that people have with slavery is stealing people, kidnapping free people against their will and making them slaves. God ABSOLUTELY condemns kidnapping people - whether they be Jew or Alien. So I think it is right to say that God does not condone slavery in the way that slavery is conducted in our world today.
- The Hebrew word in Exo 21:16 is ish, I believe, which usually referred to an adult male Israelite in the Covenant Code. Almost certainly did not apply to aliens -- you can read this more clearly in Deut 24:7.
- The number one problem I have with slavery is that I think owning another human being is wrong. Whether they were kidnapped, indentured, what have you.
- Seems to assume most slaves were sourced via kidnapping. That isn't true. Slaves could be bought from surrounding nations, captured via conquest, or even pressed into involuntary debt slavery (see 2 Kings 4, where the creditors are coming to take the woman's children as slaves). Girls could be sold into sexual slavery by their fathers. There were many tragic ways people could become slaves without being stolen off an Israelite street. And of course Israel had no way to regulate how slaves were sourced in the nations they purchased from.
Another part of the complexity is that in the time that Leviticus was written, EVERY nation on the face of the earth supported slavery. And in every nation apart from Israel, this slavery could arise from kidnapping. So there was already a clear distinction between Israel and other nations.
No, other nations were against kidnapping their citizens as well. See Babylonian law.
But I'm not really interested in whether or not Israel had a milder flavor of slavery than other nations. I'm interested in whether God condoned slavery.
Also, back in those days, and interestingly, even in the world in some places today, people would sell themselves to others for a time, known as an indenture. Even the Jews could do this for 7 years. This is a type of slavery. The idea is based on the notion that "we own ourselves". And an important part of those ownership rights of our body, was the right to sell it to someone else. Today - people don't own their own bodies. (not that the abortion movement cares) The State owns our bodies - and it has done so - since it legislated the idea that no property rights can exist in a human body. Removing the ownership of property in body, removed the ability to privately sell your body to someone else - but it also effectively proved the point that we are slaves to the State. It owns our body and it tells us what rights we have.In those times - people from other cultures could sell their bodies to another person - even to a Jew. In a sense it was a form of welfare. Or perhaps a bank mortgage.
This is only addressing debt slavery. God condones chattel slavery as well.
But make no mistake: debt slavery, much like debtor's prison, is still wrong. I have already showed that it was not always voluntary in the Bible. Poverty is not an excuse to imprison or enslave anyone, and there are many better social methods of relieving financial desperation than slavery.
The Israelites, however could not go looking for people in other cultures to buy slaves. And the reason for that is because the predominant manner in which people became slaves was by kidnapping.
I'd like you to explain this more. I don't want to misunderstand/misrepresent your argument.
The other time when Israel needed to consider slavery was in times of war. What were they to do with the foreigners they captured? If they released them - then they would form part of a group to try and get rid of them. Or they would go back and join the families they came from and start fighting again. The Jews were disliked then probably in the same way they are now. didn't have welfare in those times, so people had to make money somehow to get food. So they had to do something with them. I suppose they could kill them. But they were captured in war - and unless God said to destroy them - then they couldn't.
Lev 25:44-46 is not about preventing the enemies' survivors from mustering a rebellion. It's just basic chattel slavery. "It is okay to enslave foreigners."
Overall, I think the matter is far too a complex matter to come up with a simplistic answer.
I disagree. While God's position on slavery is nuanced, I think the question of whether he condoned slavery is a simple one, with a simple answer.